Bloomberg charity boosts global anti-smoking effort

Author: Reuters All articles by this author

More about Reuters

Mar. 23, 2012 01:11
215 159
In this Feb. 2, 2012 file photo, New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg presents the Fiscal Year 2013 preliminary budget in New York. Bloomberg on Thursday, March 22, 2012 is expected to announce he will commit $220 million to his charity to go toward programs that reduce tobacco use in developing countries .
Photo by (AP Photo/Mary Altaffer, Pool, File)
NEW YORK, March 22 (Reuters) -MichaelBloomberg's charitable foundation will commit an additional $220 million over the next four years to fighting tobacco use globally, including funding for legal challenges against the tobacco industry by countries such asUruguay.
TheNew YorkCity mayor was set to announce the new funding forBloombergPhilanthropies on Thursday at the 15th World Conference on Tobacco or Health inSingapore. His charity will monitor the tobacco industry's strategies and offer legal support to counter its pushback against anti-smoking campaigns.

Calling tobacco "a scourge all over the world" and accusing cigarette makers of "nefarious activities,"Bloombergsaid at a news conference on Friday that his foundation will focus on low and moderate-income countries where nearly 80 percent of smokers live, likeRussia,China,India,IndonesiaandBangladesh.

That marks a departure fromBloomberg's efforts since 2007, which have been funded with $375 million from the billionaire mayor's pocket. Until now, his anti-smoking campaign has focused on "what's worked here" inNew YorkCity, said Dr. Kelly Henning, director of the charity's public health programs.

That included pressing local and national governments to raise cigarette taxes; persuading the entertainment industry to deglamorize smoking by not filming movie stars smoking; making nicotine patches widely available; and, lobbying for laws that ban tobacco advertising, sponsorship and smoking in public.

Such strategies have worked. InNew YorkCity, the adult smoking rate has reached an all-time low of 14 percent, theHealth Departmentannounced last September. That is 35 percent below the rate in 2002, when the department began its anti-smoking efforts.

By comparison, the national smoking rate is 19.3 percent, according to theCenters for Disease Control and Prevention.


TheNew YorkCity example is starting to be adopted overseas. Earlier this month,Indiaincreased its cigarette tax.

"We've been doing tax advocacy inIndiafor the last year and have now seen 12 states raise their state-level value-added tax on cigarettes," said Henning. "This increase is at national level. We consider it a small step forward."

BloombergPhilanthropies' campaign has also led to laws banning smoking in public places, including workplaces and restaurants, inBrazil,TurkeyandPakistan, and cities such asJakarta,Mexico CityandHarbin CityinChina.

Working with ministries of health and non-governmental organizations, the charity has helped win the passage of laws in 11 countries mandating graphic images on cigarette packs. In theUnited States, the government and tobacco industry are battling in court over whether a similar law is constitutional.

But the global fight is growing fiercer as new regulations threaten industry profits overseas.

To counter a decline in smoking in theUnited States, cigarette makers have relied on higher prices, cost cuts and growth in smokeless tobacco to keep profits rising.

They have also targeted overseas markets, especially inChina,Indonesia, andRussia, where a growing middle class can pay up for branded products. Altria Group's 2008 spinoff ofPhilip MorrisInternational gave investors a choice between a sustainable cash return in theUnited Statesor growth prospects internationally.

According to the Tobacco Atlas, released Wednesday by theAmerican Cancer Societyand theWorld Lung Foundationat the tobacco congress, the tobacco industry reaped profits of $35 billion in 2010, "equivalent to $6,000 for each death caused by tobacco," the groups said in a statement.


As anti-tobacco policies and laws are extended in the world - they currently cover 2.2 billion people - they threaten cigarette makers' profits and the industry is fighting back.

"The industry does its work in the dark of night to undermine legislation and keep marketing to kids and all the other nefarious activities they do,"Bloombergsaid.

BloombergPhilanthropies is working against that trend by helpingUruguay, for example, battlePhilip Morris.

In 2009 the South American country adopted a law requiring that warning labels cover 80 percent (the most in the world) of the surface of cigarette packs, and that each brand have only one variant (no "lights," menthols or other brand extensions), among other restrictions.

In response,Philip MorrisInternational and three affiliates filed an official complaint againstUruguaywith theInternational Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes, part of theWorld Bank, alleging that the restrictions harmed the tobacco firms' business operations and violated a bilateral investment treaty betweenUruguayandSwitzerland, where two of the affiliates are based.

"We have supported and will continue to support effective and sensible tobacco regulations,"Philip MorrisInternational said in a statement to Reuters. "The Uruguayan regulations we are challenging are neither. For example, as a result of the regulations we had to stop selling seven of our 12 brand variations inUruguay. In the case of Marlboro, the regulation meant that the Gold, Blue and Green variations representing about 40 percent of Marlboro sales had to be taken off the market. ... We had no option but to seek legal recourse."

Bloombergis underwriting legal assistance forUruguayand helping it hire expert consultants to assist with filings, said Henning. "If industry wins this one, other countries will be terrified of adopting anti-tobacco measures," she said.

215 159

The Kyiv Post is hosting comments to foster lively public debate through the Disqus system. Criticism is fine, but stick to the issues. Comments that include profanity or personal attacks will be removed from the site. The Kyiv Post will ban flagrant violators. If you think that a comment or commentator should be banned, please flag the offending material.

comments powered by Disqus

Read more in {{sectionName}} section

All in {{sectionName}} section