You're reading: Student visa program: New rules, same problems (updated)

JACKSON, Mississippi (AP) — The State Department is publicly acknowledging that one of its most popular exchange programs leaves foreign college students vulnerable to exploitation, but it's unclear if new regulations the agency is pushing will do enough to stop the abuses.

The revised rules aim to shift more responsibility onto the 53 entities the department designates as official sponsors in the J-1 Summer Work Travel Program.

Historically, many sponsors have farmed out those duties to third-party contractors, making the sponsors "mere purveyors of J-1 visas," according to the State Department’s proposed new rules published this spring in the Federal Register.

Federal auditors have criticized the department for years for depending on sponsors, some of whom make millions of dollars off J-1 students, to oversee the program and investigate complaints.

Yet the new regulations would require little or no direct oversight by State Department employees, leaving sponsors free to continue policing themselves and their partners.

The changes are to take effect July 15, too late for thousands of students already in the country for another season of cleaning hotel rooms, waiting tables and working checkout counters.

The Summer Work Travel Program allows foreign college students to live and work in the United States for four months. It brought more than 130,000 men and women to the United States last year alone.

Students visiting under J-1 visas make ideal victims since they are here temporarily and may not know how to seek help.

An Associated Press investigation published six months ago found that many participants paid thousands of dollars to come to the U.S., only to learn the jobs they were promised didn’t exist.

Some had to share beds in crowded houses or apartments, charged so much for lodging and transportation that they took home no pay.

Others turned to the sex industry, while some sought help from homeless shelters.

In posting the proposed new rules, State Department officials detailed problems that largely mirrored the AP’s findings, then blamed lack of oversight by the sponsors, and expressed confidence the changes will help clean up the program, partly by requiring sponsors to verify that students have jobs and that the employers are legitimate.

A review of the new regulations shows they have few teeth, however.

While the changes spell out how sponsors are to vet third-party brokers and how often they are to touch base with visiting students, the rules are vague on how vigorously the State Department will check to verify those duties are done.

The proposed rules call for sponsors to compile reports, including background checks, on overseas brokers who put students in touch with them, and to submit those reports to U.S. consulates.

The department also will conduct a spot check of the biggest sponsors.

But the agency has just a handful of employees who keep track of this and other foreign exchange programs, which handle more than 300,000 participants, according to the Economic Policy Institute, a nonpartisan think tank that plans to publish a report on the program.

While the State Department acknowledged that housing and living conditions have been a problem, there’s nothing in the new regulations that addresses oversight of those issues.

The revised policies also contain no mention of penalties if sponsors are found lacking.

State Department spokesman John Fleming said rules already on the books allow sanctions ranging from written reprimands to revocation of sponsors’ designations.

But the department also acknowledged that no Summer Work Travel sponsor has ever been removed from the program for its treatment of students, despite years of complaints of exploitation and deplorable living and working conditions, according to documents obtained by the AP.

And only a few sponsors have ever been reprimanded, according to the State Department.

"You can have all the rules and the regulations in the world, but if you don’t have enforcement, the rules are worthless.

They’re not worth the paper they’re written on," said George Collins, an Okaloosa County, Florida, sheriff’s inspector who has been complaining to the State Department for 10 years about the problems.

Prompted in part by the AP project and by complaints from visiting students, the House Judiciary Committee’s immigration subcommittee had planned a hearing on the program Wednesday, but the hearing was postponed.

Participation in the summer work program has increased dramatically over the last decade, but so have the problems.

In one of the worst cases unearthed by the AP, at least two J-1 students from Ukraine were beaten and forced to work in strip clubs in Detroit.

One said she was raped by her captors.

"This is a dangerous program because the State Department has outsourced its oversight role to the program sponsors and employers who hire the participants," said Daniel Costa, an immigration policy analyst who is working on the Economic Policy Institute’s report.

State Department officials insist the "safety and well-being of all J-1 exchange participants is our top priority," and note that the vast majority of visitors under the sprawling program enjoy their stays and return home with little trouble.

The new regulations also promise closer scrutiny of participants from several nations, including Belarus, Bulgaria and Russia, that are "known sources of the types of criminal activity that the State Department wishes to avoid," according to the Federal Register. Students have been used to launder money stolen from U.S. banks, and women forced into the sex industry through the J-1 program often come from Eastern Europe.

The State Department, again shifting blame, said in the Federal Register that it wanted to publish the proposed rules changes sooner but waited after sponsors complained they had already signed contracts to provide workers this season to resorts and other employers.

"Inadequacies in U.S. sponsors’ vetting and monitoring procedures contribute to potentially dangerous or unwelcomed situations for these participants," the State Department said in the Federal Register. "This past summer the Department received a significantly increased number of complaints from foreign governments, program participants, their families, concerned American citizens."

Yet the AP found that while law enforcement and others had complained to the State Department for years about abuse in the J-1 program, the agency didn’t start tracking complaints until last year — after the AP asked for the documents in a Freedom of Information Act request.

Once the agency began keeping a log of complaints, the list quickly grew into the dozens, according to documents the AP obtained through the Freedom of Information Act.

The State Department is accepting public comments on the proposed rule changes through June 27.