It's beta of the site. Let us know your opinion.
Weather       +5 °C
Currency:  1USD  7.7  1EUR 10.27
Search:  
 
 Sign In   Register

Business

Hryvnia floats, but will it sink?

3 December 2008, 20:21 | James Marson, Kyiv Post, Staff Writer
Hryvnia floats, but will it sink?
As almost a decade of strong economic growth comes to a juddering halt, the extent to which Ukrainians will have to tighten their belts is becoming painfully clear

As almost a decade of strong economic growth comes to a juddering halt, the extent to which Ukrainians will have to tighten their belts is becoming increasingly clear.

 The hryvnia is sliding as the National Bank of Ukraine refrains from its previous policy of supporting the currency by interventions. While a weak hryvnia will help to balance the country’s wide trade deficit, it is putting pressure on Ukrainians with dollar-denominated loans and a taste for imported goods. The questions on many people’s lips are: “Where is the hryvnia going to end up and when is it going to stop sliding?”

“From next year, people will need a new psychological orientation about the value of currency,” said Oleksandr Savchenko, deputy chairman of the NBU, at a conference organized by the Fitch Ratings agency on Nov. 27.

The hryvnia-to-U.S.-dollar exchange rate jumped from 5.79 on Nov. 18 to 7.24 on Dec. 3 as the NBU curtailed its previous policy of supporting the national currency by selling dollars or euros, in line with conditions set by the International Monetary Fund. The IMF emergency standby credit of $16.4 billion granted last month comes in tranches, which will be made available as Ukraine fulfills a series of strict conditions.

“Without a flexible exchange rate, we can’t overcome the crisis. No amount of currency reserves would be sufficient,” Savchenko said. “At the moment it is a free-floating exchange rate with the possibility of correction by the NBU.”

Supporting the hryvnia saw NBU reserves plummet from $38 billion to $32 billion in October. “The market is looking for the adequate exchange rate. We understand that [this process] is shocking,” Savchenko added. But continuing to spend reserves would simply delay finding the hryvnia’s true value, he added.

The hryvnia has come under pressure in recent months as export revenues have dried up, while domestic demand for dollars has shot up. Ukrainian companies are gearing up to repay foreign loans and citizens have rushed to convert savings out of the national currency. NBU figures show that Ukrainians bought $2 billion more in foreign currency in November than they sold.

On Nov. 30, President Victor Yushchenko blamed the hryvnia’s depreciation on “a large-scale speculative attack.” He added, there are no economic reasons for the current exchange rate to be higher than 6 hryvnia to the U.S. dollar. He criticized the NBU’s refinancing of banks, saying that funds were immediately used by banks to buy currency. The respected weekly Zerkalo Nedeli published accusations on Nov. 29 that the hryvnia was held at below 6 to the dollar earlier this month “so that the necessary people could … buy foreign currency at a profitable rate. This was then sent offshore under fictitious import contracts, in order to wait for better times.”

The hryvnia’s devaluation should provide a boost to the economy by supporting exporters, priming the country’s businesses for the expected resurgence in demand in the second half of 2009. “Any recovery depends on the global environment, the demand for Ukrainian products. A strong devaluation is the only way [the authorities can] affect exports,” said Gerhard Boesch, deputy board chairman at Raiffeisen Bank Aval.

A weak hryvnia will also lead to a decrease in imports, taming Ukraine’s current account deficit, which in October increased to 6.5 percent of GDP, up from 5.8 percent one month earlier. The deficit has widened the back of rising consumer demand, and a most recent sharp fall in exports.

But while these macroeconomic benefits seem a long way off, devaluation is putting strain on Ukrainians’ finances by pushing up the price of dollar loan repayments and imported goods, as well as threatening the already-struggling banking sector.

“There are two competing forces. There is a need for a real exchange rate, but also a need for the banking system to survive,” said Balazs Horvath, the IMF’s representative in Ukraine. “Adjustment has to be balanced against risk.”

“There is a level … beyond which the system may become insolvent, because of the large share of foreign currency loans in portfolios,” said the Association of Ukrainian Banks after a meeting of banking leaders. The NBU puts the proportion of dollar-denominated loans at 50 percent.

On the same day, Fitch Ratings downgraded the outlook of 11 Ukrainian banks to negative on the back of concerns about the implications of the falling hryvnia for the quality of assets. Fitch also cited concerns that the falling hryvnia will eat into already-low confidence in the banking sector and could lead to further deposit withdrawals and dollarization.

Top NBU officials have repeatedly called on people not to panic, and hit out at the media for fuelling concerns. “It’s not satisfactory to live by the rules of panic,” Savchenko said.

These problems have been compounded by a chronic lack of dollars available to exchange, as the NBU limited the selling price of dollars to no more than 1.5 percent above the official rate, making it not profitable for banks to sell dollars. Dollars are now becoming increasingly available, local media reported, after the NBU cancelled the restrictions, but with commission charged at up to 15 percent.

Savchenko said he believed the hryvnia had almost reached its correct level, but analysts have predicted more pressure on the currency into next year, as the price for natural gas imports swells and tens of billions of dollars in corporate debt owed to foreign lenders comes due. Other analysts suggest a stabilization in the exchange rate as the population starts to convert back to hryvnia to spend on basic needs.

Oleksandr Klymchuk, an analyst at Concorde Capital, said that the exchange rate also depends on foreign currency inflows through foreign direct investment and privatization. “If these are strong, the hryvnia can strengthen and stay at 7.5 to the dollar. If not, we’ll be looking at 9 or 10,” he added.

In the short term, the NBU appears powerless to intervene in the hryvnia’s slide as one of the IMF conditions stipulates that only $2-$4 billion can be spent until the end of this year to support the currency, ING Bank wrote on Dec. 1. “The reserves requirement means that the possibility for intervention doesn’t exist,” said Anastasia Golovach, an analyst with Renaissance Capital. “The best the NBU can do is smooth the hryvnia’s fall.”

  Comments (18)
Add your comment
Left 1000 symbols
.
Comments on page
Steeler  (Guest) | 10.12.2008, 06:08
Ukraine is a highly corrupt and inefficient state. Personally I am glad the issue of Ukraine joining NATO is off the table for now. America has nothing to gain from putting yet another burden on its shoulders and pouring our tax dollars into that bottomless pit. Mike2 said it well – this smelly boor does not belong in the club that it seeks to join. Ukraine needs to get its act together first.
Answer  
Mike2  (Guest) | 07.12.2008, 16:13
Ukraine is a DEMOCRACY now unlike RUSSIA. All the problems of Ukraine are due to RUSSIA.

The EU dropped Ukraine for Russia because they are BAD people.

The Orange Revolution made Ukraine a happy country. We dont really understand what economy is all about, it economy goes bad it is because of RUSSIA.

The WEST is BAD because it started understanding the SAAKASHVILI is just a fucked up HOTHEAD. The support of Yushenko came from the heart, there was no need to THINK.

If the west goes for RUSSIA it is only because of GAS. the is REALLY no other reason. Maybe there are many, like the one that we behave like KIDS but we keep on screaming that it is only about GAS.

Now we are ennemies of FRANCE, GERMANY AND ITALY. BOO FRANCE, GERMANY and ITALY. They are REALLY BAD PEOPLE.
Answer  
Guest  (Guest) | 02.01.2009, 09:18
There is still one of the biggest Mafia networks working in UKraine. Politiicans are killed, in a mysterious way (while hunting in the forest) and further strange things happen.

There are too many people, with a lot of power, which profit from the current situation. As long as they are so rich and powerful, nothing will change.
Answer  
Youssechka from France  (Guest) | 04.12.2008, 11:03
The Doctor (IMF) comes to resuscitate a patient in the agony but to put the hand on all the assets(active persons) of the Nation. President Ioutchenko, ex President of the Central Bank, has to explain to his people all the reasons of this economic failure. It is counterproductive to focus the Ukrainians on the Russian imaginary enemy. The priorities and the concerns(preoccupations) of Ukrainian are in the survival. The will of the President to adhere(subscribe) to the NATO is not the one of the people who is more lucid than his President. The west will not help Ukraine but will want to colonize it economically and to use it in scarecrow in front of the Russian Older brother.
Answer  
Mykhailo from Ukraine  (Guest) | 04.12.2008, 16:21
It is so sad to see educated people from Europe failing to see the real picture of the economic and political situation in Ukraine and the world. What\'s counterproductive indeed is by Germany and France to close the doors before Ukraine\'s intentions to join NATO and EU in their disgusting attempt to please Russia at cost of supporting an emerging democracy in Ukraine.
IMF has indeed discredited itself in many cases, but for Ukraine it provides the necessary stimulus to implement the long awaited reforms. Had they been implemented earlier (flexible rate, limit on social expenditures, increased government investement in infrastructure) we would have come out of current crisis without the help of IMF at all.
It is also regrettable to hear arguments against IMF help to Ukraine from Germans and French taking into account that these 2 were the main recepients of the Marshall plan, which was the major reason of Europe\'s current economic prosperity.
Answer  
castorp  (Guest) | 04.12.2008, 16:54
I agree with you Mikhaillo about the French, German (and Italian too!) policy concerning EU integration for Ukraine. It\'s an historical mystake (but how couln\'t it be when you see than in the last 17 years from Ukraine independance no French Pr
Answer  
castorp  (Guest) | 04.12.2008, 16:55
I agree with you Mikhaillo about the French, German (and Italian too!) policy concerning EU integration for Ukraine. It\'s an historical mistake (but how couldn’t it be when you see than in the last 17 years from Ukraine independence no French President has got the idea to come and visit the largest European country.....). They are hypnotized by Russia!
But the main responsible of the current situation in Ukraine is also the Ukrainian politicians who seem more interested by their personal businesses and ambition than Ukraine future (except Yulia who looks as the only \"State man\" in the country...). The spectacle they are showing and Iushenko first of all is very sad! It\'s a pity that Ukraine politicians had to wait for IMF intervention for starting to manage correctly the situation.
Answer  
Guest  (Guest) | 04.12.2008, 18:55
I\'m not so sure what would be the reason a French president, or any respectable EU president would gain by visiting Kyiv. False promises? Fake smiles? Fake handshakes, etc...

Also, to call the gucci thugs in the Rada \"politicians\" is a complete joke! What political skills do any of them have? How many of them were actually elected by the people? It\'s simply a bogus party name followed by lots of money to become a so-called parliament member.

Money for reforms. The gov\'t has already floundered 80% of the first 8 billion from the IMF. Read the Wall Street Journal. Their is your reform money.
Youssechka from France  (Guest) | 04.12.2008, 19:06
I agree with MYKHAILO concerning the sadness of the situation in Ukraine the development potential of which is enormous. France and Germany oppose to the membership of Ukraine to the NATO because their interests are stronger with Russia at the energy level. The west argues in interests but makes some democracy its advertising . The Plan Marshall is not the IMF. We know well the results of the program of structural adjustment of the IMF. It is the people who is going to pay to go out of the big crisis. We see well the disastrous results of the democracy in colors orange. When we fail, we are unpopular and we say to ourselves democrat, it is necessary to restore, return the power to the people and answer in front of his acts.
Answer  
Youssechka from France  (Guest) | 04.12.2008, 19:25
The membership of Ukraine in the european economic area adorned me justifiable for its economic development. On the other hand I see no interest to put in danger a country in its internal stability for its membership to the NATO which is the arm armed with the imperialism and which had to disappear further to dislocation of the Soviet Union. The unity of Ukraine will be conditioned by its not membership to the NATO.The neutrality would give all the guarantees of internal stability and the economic advantages in the East as on the West . I have just read that the President Ioutchenko wishes to restore good relations with Russia. Did he become suddenly lucid or because he has no more the choice???
A Big Lover of UKRAINE

Youssechka
Answer  
Mike2  (Guest) | 07.12.2008, 16:20
Mykhailo, lets try a comparison.

Europe would be like a well run gentlemens club. Consensus and rules of behaviour prevail. Comes a candidate member, badly educated, screaming that he smells bad because his neighbour is an evil person. He claims that he has to be member of the club because he lives in the area. If the club refuses the membership, the candidate starts screaming that is is because the bad neigbour want him to fail.

We forgot to mention that our candidate puts his newly acquried hometheater to maximum volume every evening, leaves his rubbish in the stairs and writes graffitis on the wall.

Would you take such a member in your club?
Answer  
Youssechka from France  (Guest) | 04.12.2008, 10:49
The conditions or the Dictat of the IMF for the granting of the loan are very strict. It passes by the privatizations of public enterprises or the sale of the pieces of family jewellery,of people in the foreign capital and below their values. The product of these sales will go to fill the deficits without that it can benefit their owners who is the people. The reduction of the budgetary deficit means the reduction of the public spending: wage freeze of the civil servants (not for leaders and accomplices) net cups(cuttings) in the spending(expenses) health-
Answer  
Guest  (Guest) | 04.12.2008, 02:00
From the States,

It\'s amazing how much the dollar has appreciated against both the Euro and the hryvnia. It\'s good for people like me who want to travel to Europe or Ukraine, but the working people of both areas are getting a bad deal, that is certain. Our economy is bad and getting worse, but due to several factors, the dollar is presently in an uptrend.

The IMF policies will make the working people bear the burnt of the \"reforms\", sad to say.
Answer  
Guest  (Guest) | 04.12.2008, 20:05
dollar appreciated precisely because the US Economy is so bad... US companies had to repatriate their money from abroad, i.e. buy dollars... also helping overseas stock markets tumble along the way.

who you gotta feel sorry for also are the Japanese... yen keeps on going up and they had a hard enough time exporting as it was.. oh well, they had their time in the spotlight... just like America...

gotta look on the bright side of this mess though, at least America won\'t be attacking any new countries any time soon.. they can\'t afford it anymore.
Answer  
Guest  (Guest) | 06.12.2008, 21:38
I went to Ukraine and saw that nothing had changed over 8 years.
Ukrainskiy rouble also known as gryvnya)) is going down and it should be. It\'s the great time to travel to Europe since the dollar is getting stronger against euros, pounds and all other paper notes.
ps- Go Red Wings!!!
Answer  
Youssechka  (Guest) | 04.12.2008, 00:53
There is a lot of resemblance with the crisis in Argentina in 2000 years. Ukraine is not free of its movements, its choices to lead the economic policy because it is the IMF which dictates its law and its program of structural adjustment and the people of which are going to pay a full price for the loan of 16,4 billions of dollards. The fluctuations in the exchange rates are the rule and the hrivna will continue its skid because the central Bank cannot intervene due to the lack of reserves and under the command of the IMF. The international crisis which is still in front of us, will not incite a return of the foreign investors in a weakened country and in the grip of the doubt. The people in charge of such an economic and social disaster have to meditate in their Porshe Cayenne and read again Machiavelli. The people risk to pay a full price for the greediness of his leaders and decision-makers. To govern it is to anticipate but apparently, it is not the case.
Answer  
Guest  (Guest) | 08.12.2008, 10:54
For everybody in the group:

The present Ukraine leaders are thiefs making fortunes on the Gas transits, illegal arms trade and the state budget embezzlement. Their potential replacements are no better.
The country is clearly split on three economic zones: western ukraine oriented on being a source of cheap skllled labor to the europe, eastern and crimea heavy manufacturing oriented on basic services to russia and europe, central ukraine has not much to offer except retaining control of military and law enforcement with rapidly deteriorating scientific potential.
Neither Europe nor Russia need Ukraine in this present for as a functioning state. The hint; Russia distributes passports in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine while Poland does the same in Western Ukraine.
The worrying part is the Central Ukraine has to be very vigorous to retain control of both and it is rapidly running out of \"civilized\" options. So, one might wonder if they have a guts and power hunger to go all the way.
Answer  
Mike2  (Guest) | 09.12.2008, 17:17
Let not forget that is was Ukraine who begged at the IMF and not the other way around. Why the IMF? it is the last resort, you go there when you have run out of options. IMF rules could have been useful to Ukraine, however the political class - of all orientations - will suck the blood out of the benefits.
Answer  
Advertising

MOST POPULAR ARTICLES: