

© kievskaya.com.ua
Lytvyn orders extraordinary session in parliament on July 30
Analyst: Martyniuk or majority representative could take up post of parliament speaker
Constitutional court rules election of Rada speaker by secret ballot unconstitutional
Lytvyn proposes holding nationwide roundtable on language issues
Lytvyn: President has to send to parliament letter with proposals on language bill
Lytvyn's resignation directly linked with further fate of language bill
"The procedure for electing the Verkhovna Rada head concerns issues of the internal organization of the parliament's work, which cannot be subject to constitutional normative control," he said.
The press service recalled that MPs had asked the Constitutional Court to recognize unconstitutional the provisions of the rules of procedure on the election of speaker by secret ballot by submitting ballots and provided that ballots are received by at least two thirds of MPs of their actual number.
At the same time, Lytvyn noted that the Constitution of Ukraine does not contain clauses and cannot regulate the procedure for holding a vote on the election of the Verkhovna Rada head.
"However, only the Verkhovna Rada has the right to change the existing procedure of voting by filing ballots when the issue concerns, in particular, the election of the head of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine and his dismissal from office (Paragraph 15, Part 1, Article 85 and Paragraph 21, Part 1, Article 92 of the Constitution of Ukraine)," the speaker said in a letter to the Constitutional Court.
In addition, Lytvyn said that MPs had not taken into account the fact that regulating the internal organization of parliamentary work is outside the competence of the Constitutional Court.
"Changing such a legal position, which is proposed by a group of people's deputies of Ukraine, would be intervention in the competence of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine that adopts laws, which was confirmed by the signature of the Ukrainian president concerning the constitutionality of parliament's powers to decide itself on intra-organizational relations," the speaker said.
As reported on July 3, the Verkhovna Rada adopted the language bill in the absence of Lytvyn, which triggered a series of protests in Ukraine.
Lytvyn refused to sign the law and tendered his resignation, but lawmakers refused to consider his statement.
On July 4, the Verkhovna Rada introduced amendments to its rules of procedure on the election, appointment and recall of its officials.
According to the adopted law, the decision on the election of parliament speaker is made through an open roll-call vote by a majority of deputies of the constitutional composition. Earlier, the speaker was elected by secret ballot by two thirds of MPs.
Batkivschyna, UDAR, Svoboda to coordinate their actions at presidential election
Batkivschyna activists give Ukrainian authorities 5,000 signatures for Tymoshenko's release
Azarov: MPs won't be scared of fines for missing parliamentary sittings
Kozhara discusses with Ashton, Fule in Krakow association agreement signing prospects
Tymoshenko: Europe offers friendship to Ukraine, government ignores it
Ex-premier Masol claims Yanukovych was involved in Scherban's murder
Kivalov: Lavrynovych wants parliament to elect him as the Supreme Council of Justice member
The simple question that arises is what constitutes an "open roll-call" vote? Is it a raising of hands? Is it standing up when called to do so in voting for yes or for no? Is it voting electronically? If it means voting electronically then it is tantamount to legalizing "piano voting" (where anyone can vote multiple times as long as they have another VR member's voting card). Is it no wonder that the vast majority of the mostly educated Ukrainian electorate have such a universal disdain for the Verkhovna Rada?