Economist: The Ukrainian government is losing two PR battles

Print version
June 26, 2012, 7:22 p.m. | Ukraine abroad — by Economist

On June 26th, Jailed Yulia Tymoshenko's appeal against the seven-year sentence she is currently serving, for abuse of office in negotiating a gas deal with Russia in 2009, was up for consideration in Kyiv.

The Ukrainian government is not good at PR. This week has seen another blunder, as Yulia Tymoshenko was summoned to two court hearings on the two days' break in Euro 2012. The jailing of the former prime minister and de facto opposition leader has already led many European politicians to boycott matches in the football tournament that Ukraine is co-hosting with Poland.

A hearing was scheduled on June 25th in Kharkiv in a separate case, for tax evasion involving Ms Tymoshenko's former company, United Energy Systems of Ukraine. On June 26th, Ms Tymoshenko's appeal against the seven-year sentence she is currently serving, for abuse of office in negotiating a gas deal with Russia in 2009, was up for consideration in Kyiv.

Read more here.

The Kyiv Post is hosting comments to foster lively debate. Criticism is fine, but stick to the issues. Comments that include profanity or personal attacks will be removed from the site. If you think that a posted comment violates these standards, please flag it and alert us. We will take steps to block violators.
Brunislav June 26, 2012, 7:49 p.m.    

The allegation that Tymoshenko's private company owed the Russian Ministry of Defense about 400,000 dollars at least finally begins to get into specifics about the former prime minister's corruption while in office. Too often I've only heard vague remarks that since she was involved in the gas industry in the 1990s she must have been involved in corruption at one time or another. It all just seems too speculative and unsubstantial.
If there's any evidence to back up this allegation it would be quite interesting. In the end I'm left wondering though--400,000 dollars? That doesn't really amount to a hill of beans for the Russian Ministry of Defense. A single airplane costs at least twice as much if not more. Why take such a risk over such a small debt?

{# <-- parent id goes here
dave June 27, 2012, 6:49 p.m.    

brother, it's not 400 thousand dollars that Tymoshenko's company owed the Russians, it's 400 MILLION dollars. The charges are that she tried to get this debt covered by Ukraine's government budget. In US or UK, even the best-connected thieves could never dream to steal nearly so much as Ukrainian officials in the 1990s...

{# <-- parent id goes here
IvanovPetrovSidorov June 28, 2012, 2:08 p.m.    

She may be a more progressive politician than those currently in government, but if she has skeletons in the cupboard, she must come clean of them. Too many politicians bang on about morals when they fall foul of the law, yet try to hide their own sins behind the veil of legality when it suits them.

{# <-- parent id goes here
bernardh June 28, 2012, 2:42 p.m.    

Well, here are some research questions before you jump to conclusions about the alleged UESU debt:
1/ When and how did the alleged debt emerge?
2/ Is Tymoshenko mentioned at all in the letter from the Russian ministry of defense?
3/ Does the Russian ministry of defense make any claims to the Ukrainain government to pay the alleged debt?
4/ what exactly is the allegedly criminal act by Tymoshenko?

{# <-- parent id goes here


© 1995–2014 Public Media

Web links to Kyiv Post material are allowed provided that they contain a URL hyperlink to the material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. Otherwise, all materials contained on this site are protected by copyright law and may not be reproduced without the prior written permission of Public Media at
All information of the Interfax-Ukraine news agency placed on this web site is designed for internal use only. Its reproduction or distribution in any form is prohibited without a written permission of Interfax-Ukraine.