KyivPost

Financial Times: Ukraine corruption festers

Print version
Feb. 7, 2011, 1:14 p.m. | Ukraine abroad — by Roman Olearchyk

Roman Olearchyk

Kyiv Post Staff Writer

One year into his presidential term, has Ukraine’s Viktor Yanukovych started to deliver on his pledges to cut corruption, reduce red tape and improve the country’s miserable investment climate? The honest answer is “not really”, although the generous might be inclined to say “not yet”.
Speaking on condition of anonymity, investors say that shakedowns by officials and non-transparent dealings are growing to unprecedented levels.
Announcement To Readers

Since 1995, the Kyiv Post has been the world's window on Ukraine. Please support the newspaper’s quality, independent journalism with a digital subscription. Subscribers receive unlimited access to all stories, archives and PDFs from the Kyiv Post's staff writers and news services.
More info.

12 months
1 month
$50.00Pay $20.00Pay
The Kyiv Post is hosting comments to foster lively debate. Criticism is fine, but stick to the issues. Comments that include profanity or personal attacks will be removed from the site. If you think that a posted comment violates these standards, please flag it and alert us. We will take steps to block violators.
Anonymous Feb. 7, 2011, 5:14 p.m.    

This is the WHOLE STORY ,,,,,,,

UKRAINE AND ITS GOV'T CORRUPTION IS A CESSPOOL OF POLITICAL RATS........

Yanukalin does not want to clean up corruption....he wants to keep Ukraine for himself and his oligarch mafia rats.........(See comments below))

One year into his presidential term, has Ukraine’s Viktor Yanukovich started to deliver on his pledges to cut corruption, reduce red tape and improve the country’s miserable investment climate?

The honest answer is “not really”, although the generous might be inclined to say “not yet”. With the International Monetary Fund supervising the economy under the terms of a $15.5bn rescue loan, the administration should be working over-time to clean up business life. It is not.

Yanukovich won last year’s presidential election exactly 12 months ago, partly by promising to clean up and painting his opponent, the glamorous Yulia Tymoshenko, as corrupt.

However, well-connected business tycoons have been allowed to cash in on lucrative deals at the nation’s expense and appear to be flourishing under his oligarch-backed administration.

Martin Raiser, head of the World Bank’s office in Ukraine, said: “Ukraine still has an awful lot of work to do to improve its investment climate.” In the corruption perception index compiled by Transparency International late last year, Ukraine ranked at 134 among the nations – that is a bit better than 146 (as in 2009) but the same as 2008 (also 134).

Speaking on condition of anonymity, investors say that shakedowns by officials and non-transparent dealings are growing to unprecedented levels.

A case in point is the plight of international grain traders such as Cargill, Toepfer International and Bunge. For more than a decade, foreign agribusinesses have invested in developing Ukraine’s promising agriculture sector.

But last year the Yanukovich administration delivered a double whammy. In a bid to keep domestic food prices low, Kiev restricted grain exports last summer. Then it granted a disproportionate share of export quotas, more than half, to just three domestic companies.

The entire affair has been “unjustified, untransparent, and unfair,” says the American Chamber of Commerce in Ukraine, which represents foreign businesses.

The 2010 harvest, while lower than that in three previous years, is the third largest in Ukrainian history. The American chamber says preferred grain exporters will profit greatly amid record global grain prices.

But the quotas – still in place – will cause up to $2.6 billion damage to Ukraine’s agricultural sector in terms of lost export income, the Chamber estimates.

In fuel supplies too, foreign-owned companies headed by Royal Dutch Shell and TNK-BP, the Russian-British-owned group, have also experienced what foreign business people and the American chamber says is unfair competition.

A little-known company was last year permitted to import more than 1m tonnes of oil and motor fuels tax and duty-free via what the chamber calls a loophole.

These imports amounted to around 60 percent of all oil imports and cost the state coffers millions of dollars in lost revenue. They stopped after protests from the Chamber.

The Chamber said in a recent letter to Ukraine’s authorities:

At a time when the government takes difficult and unpopular decisions [cutting public spending], the [duty and tax free import privileges exploited by some companies] not only allows certain companies to evade paying taxes, but also distorts free competition on the Ukrainian fuel market, threatening investment in this sector.

European companies largely take the same view. British Ambassador Leigh Turner this month criticised a lack of transparency in how Ukraine refunds Value Added Tax to exporters, saying:

Some companies receive it quickly, some receive it slowly, and some companies do not receive them at all. Unfortunately, there is an opinion, that how quickly you receive the VAT refund may be influenced either by political connections or corruption. Clearly, this is a catastrophic situation for business climate.

Ukraine officials insist the complaints are taken seriously. Vitaly Lukyanenko, a Ukrainian government spokesperson said: “The government does not only recognize the big corruption problem, but is taking steps to combat it across the board.”

Referring specifically to the allegations that grain export quotas are distributed unfairly, Lukyanenko said: “We have appealed to grain market players, asking for concrete examples of corruption at play, but we have not received proof from the business community.”

He added: “We will combat them. But we have not received any concrete examples from the side of the business community.”

Lukyanenko also commented on claims that a few domestic companies had received special rights to import oil products duty-free. He said it was “unfortunate” that the privileges enjoyed by one particular company had been upheld by a Ukrainian court.

He added: “The government is working hard to end such unfair status in setting up market conditions that would set a fair playing field for all.”

If the IMF is serious about improving the Ukrainian economy, a delegation visiting Kiev this month should take a close look at these issues. Otherwise the country’s macro-economic performance, especially its fiscal management, will be seriously undermined. And Yanukovich’s record in fighting corruption will be no better than his predecessors.

{# <-- parent id goes here
Anonymous Feb. 7, 2011, 8:28 p.m.    

QUOTE: &quot;... glamorous Yulia Tymoshenko ...&quot;

That was the positive note....

{# <-- parent id goes here

KyivPost

© 1995–2014 Public Media

Web links to Kyiv Post material are allowed provided that they contain a URL hyperlink to the www.kyivpost.com material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. Otherwise, all materials contained on this site are protected by copyright law and may not be reproduced without the prior written permission of Public Media at news@kyivpost.com
All information of the Interfax-Ukraine news agency placed on this web site is designed for internal use only. Its reproduction or distribution in any form is prohibited without a written permission of Interfax-Ukraine.