

A man looks on after he symbolically places tape over the mouth of Ukrainian poet Taras Shevchenko's monument during a protest against a language bill in the western city of Lviv on July 6, 2012. Ukraine's fractious parliament adjourned for a summer recess despite failing to resolve a crisis over its rushed passing of a controversial bill elevating the status of Russian'. In its final session, the Verkhovna Rada voted not to even consider whether to accept the resignation of speaker Volodymyr Lytvyn who announced he would quit after not being warned the chamber was preparing to pass the bill.
© AFP
Lviv Economic Forum to present agrarian potential of Lviv region
Analyst: Language law unlikely to add rating to Regions Party
Rally to protect Ukrainian language to be held near Ukrainian House on Independence Day
Rally to protect Ukrainian language to be held near Ukrainian House on Independence Day
Yanukovych signs contentious Russian language law into force
RIA Novosti: Ukraine’s controversial language bill signed into law
RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty: Controversial language bill signed by Lytvyn
Lytvyn warns Yanukovych of possible language bill negative consequences
Opposition: Lytvyn 'takes part in crime' by signing language bill
The deputies of Lviv Regional Council has ordered its chairman, Oleh Pankevych, to file an appeal at the Higher Administrative Court of Ukraine (HACU) against the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on recognizing as unlawful its actions in the preparation and adoption of the law on the principles of state language policy, the press service of the Svoboda Party reported on Thursday, Aug. 2.
Ninety deputies voted for the decision on the socio-political situation, including the abovementioned appeal, at an extraordinary session of Lviv Regional Council on August 2
The appeal states that the language law was passed in violation of the Constitution of Ukraine and the law on the parliament's rules of procedure.
In addition, the regional council submitted a statement to the Prosecutor General's Office and the Security Service of Ukraine regarding evidence of criminality in the actions of the Verkhovna Rada and its officials during the preparation and adoption of the language law, as envisaged under Part 3, Article 161 of the Criminal Code (intentional acts committed by an organized group of individuals and aimed at inciting national enmity and hatred, humiliation of national honor and dignity, as well as the direct or indirect restriction of rights of citizens on grounds of language).
As reported, the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine passed the law on the principles of state language policy initiated by the Regions Party on July 3. The document significantly expands the sphere of use of Russian and languages of other national minorities in the regions where they are used by at least 10% of population. Members of the Regions Party parliamentary faction Vadym Kolesnichenko and Serhiy Kivalov are the authors of the law.
The approval of the document by the parliament triggered a number of protests across the country. In particular, a hunger strike and a mass protest were staged near the Ukrainian House in Kyiv following the vote.
Verkhovna Rada Chairman Volodymyr Lytvyn refused to sign the law and submitted a letter of resignation. However, the Verkhovna Rada twice held votes of confidence in the speaker, and did not accept his resignation.
On July 31, Lytvyn signed the law on the principles of state language policy. The law has already been sent to Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych for signature.
Two thirds of Ukrainians displeased with Ukraine's economic development
Cabinet suggests lawmakers improve intellectual property protection in Ukraine
Placement of eurobonds worth $500 m to cost Ukrzaliznytsia $4 m
Czech Republic to grant frequent visas for tourism and healthcare from May 22
Mi-17 helicopter with new Motor Sich engines makes unique flight over Andes
Monday's headlines: Clashes at weekend rallies; Poroshenko discusses success
Excellent! I am glad that KP have adopted Russia Today's methods in censoring comments. Funny that it only started when they published the article about increases in their funding. Hmmmm. Who's paying for their journalism now? SvoVoda? Xylia? DiasPoRa?
but in russia,ukraine language is official?
I think KP has finally cleaned up this unruly 'forum'. 99% of the 'mat' and vitriol was from one Canadian, probably from the left coast judging from the times he posted, said Canadian using literally about 10 or so different names and accounts on KP.
I would suggest one sticks to discussion of the articles published here and we'll see what happens in the long run. Many, MANY of the erudite posters have left because of the filth spewed forth here, and I would think that when potential advertisers saw what was going on here they took their money elsewhere.
KP is a business, pure and simple. Yes, they provide a service that many of us read and enjoy, but bottom line KP is a business. No business can survive having someone 'in the parking lot' so to speak denigrating all the potential customers who want to enter the store.
We'll see what happens with a little time.
Is there standing to appeal when the bill has not been signed into law?
I have no idea, but I would think not.