KyivPost

Ukraine media feel the squeeze ahead of election

Print version
Oct. 9, 2012, 12:44 p.m. | Ukraine — by Reuters

Protesters hold blank posters during a protest against a government-backed bill that envisions jail time for defamation in Kyiv, Ukraine, Monday, Oct. 1, 2012. Ukraine's journalists saying the authorities will use the law to silence the media.
© AP

Reuters

For Natalia Sokolenko, an award-winning Ukrainian TV reporter, the last straw was when she was taken off covering the national political scene and demoted to reporting road accidents for the commercial news station where she had worked for 10 years.

Her career, she said, had been on a slide since she lobbed a provocative question at President Viktor Yanukovich and fought attempts by politicians and businessmen to buy screen time at her STB channel on the sly.

With a parliamentary election due on Oct. 28, journalists complain of increased pressure on independent newspapers and key TV news outlets from the authorities and their allies.

If Yanukovich's Regions Party and its partners hold on to their majority as expected, they fear the screws will only tighten in a country due to preside over the regional security, development and democracy promotion body, OSCE, from January.

Cases like Sokolenko's highlight the weak state of the media in Ukraine half way through Yanukovich's five years as president and 20 years after the former Soviet republic won independence.

After six months covering the traffic and highways 'beat' 37-year-old Sokolenko quit. "I thought of everything I had achieved. I thought of my youth and my talent. Here I was covering road accidents. So I left," she said.

Several weeks on she is still without a job in mainstream journalism, and has stepped up her campaign for media rights.

TVi, one the few stations which criticises the government, says the government is putting pressure on cable company providers which distribute it.

Proposed legislation to make libel a jailable offence has caused alarm in media circles. A draft law has been dropped after an outcry, though opposition leaders warn it could return in another form after the election.

And there is also an enemy within: journalists who censor their own news items under pressure from politicians or make gratuitous mention of politicians in them in return for payment.

Politicians and big business groups, media watchdogs say, are going to ever greater lengths to persuade media executives to publish paid-for "news" or screen time to massage their candidates' image as election day approaches.

Many commentators forsee even greater state control of media if, as expected, Yanukovich's Party of the Regions consolidates its grip on the 450-seat parliament this month.

"I am afraid that after the parliamentary election there will be a tightening of the screws to purge information space," said Iryna Bekeshkina, director of the Democratic Initiative Foundation think-tank.

Yanukovich's administration denies this and says he is committed to preventing any pressure being exerted on the media, especially in the run-up to the election.

GONGADZE CASE

Media freedom has played a pivotal role in post-Soviet Ukraine since the murder of opposition journalist Georgiy Gongadze in 2000 sparked protests which marked a turning point in former President Leonid Kuchma's 10-year-rule.

The leadership of the "Orange Revolution" highlighted it in the fight for power they won in 2005 after street protests and "Orange" leader Viktor Yushchenko's presidency brought unprecedented freedom - often to his own discomfort.

Yushchenko's clashes with prime minister Yulia Tymoshenko, his unsuccessful relations with Russia, his personal foibles and the exotic life-style of his son all became fair game.

All that changed when Yanukovich came to power in 2010. There are, for instance, now no satirical TV programmes poking fun at the leadership as they did during the Yushchenko years.

Media criticism of Yanukovich is muted to say the least.

Sokolenko, who won an award for Ukraine's best TV reporter in 2009, says her troubles began in July 2011 when at a news conference given by Yanukovich she alleged that his son, Viktor, who is a deputy, had proxy votes on his behalf in parliament.

"I asked him why he allowed his son to violate the constitution like this. He got angry and said that he hoped if I had children they would be as good as his," Sokolenko said.

After that, and as she became increasingly involved in campaigning for press rights, she gradually lost access to government and presidential briefings - and began the slide down to the traffic and highways 'beat'.

As in most other ex-Soviet republics, television is far and away the main provider of news for the 46 million population, but there is no independent public TV channel and almost all TV stations have a wealthy backer.

TVi station saw the writing on the wall when it was raided by the tax police - a classic harassment tactic in post-Soviet societies.

The State Tax Service said it had launched a criminal case against TVi's chief executive, Mykola Knyazhitsky, saying the channel had evaded more than 3 million hryvnias ($375,000) in VAT payments.

Though the tax evasion case was dropped, the station says local cable companies have come under pressure either to give TVi up or move it to more expensive packages, putting it beyond the means of many of its traditional viewers.

The station's audience has correspondingly slumped from 13 million to 9 million, Knyazhitsky said.

PAID-FOR 'NEWS'

Yanukovich's Regions and its allies, backed by wealthy industrialists and businessmen, face a United Opposition bloc, including the Batkivshchyna (Fatherland) party of jailed former prime minister Yulia Tymoshenko, and the UDAR (Punch) party of WBC world heavweight boxing champion Vitaly Klitschko.

A big Regions victory, the opposition fears, will lead to a roll-back of the social and civil liberties gained in the Orange Revolution.

One feature of the Ukrainian press which never died out even under Yushchenko's presidency is the practice of paid-for "news" - colloquially known in Ukraine as 'jeansa' - deriving from the idea of slipping money into the back pocket of jeans.

Telekrytika, a Ukrainian web-based media watchdog, says as much as $80,000 will change hands for a leading politician to ensure a guest appearance on a popular TV show, while a 20-second TV sound-bite in a news bulletin may cost just $200.

"There is a complete frenzy now ahead of the elections. Deputies are now shamelessly paying not just the journalists but their managers and the editors above them," Sokolenko said.

Knyazhitsky of TVi said politicians regularly extended lucrative offers to get the station to insert a screen-shot or sound-bite of their candidates into news bulletins.

"They say to us: 'We'll place our party's advertising with you as long as you feature reports about our politicians.' This is common practice on the Ukrainian television market," he told Reuters, adding that TVi refused these offers.

STB channel, where Sokolenko worked, was unavailable for comment on whether it practised 'jeansa'.

The Internet is more free, but at the same time even more susceptible to 'jeansa' as most bloggers and Web news outlets do not even pretend to be balanced or neutral.

BLANK PAGE

Media circles say it is standard practice now for Yanukovich's aides to call prominent TV channels to provide direction on how specific issues should be handled.

Replying to a question from Reuters, Yanukovich's administration said the leadership was committed to the principle of defending the free press against "any pressure or interference", though it said the approach to the election could be marked by "increased emotion" and "provocative actions".

"The authorities will react sharply to any violations of freedom of expression," it said in a statement.

Yanukovich himself regularly speaks out in support of a free press and in New York last week criticised a draft law presented by a Regions deputy that would re-criminalise libel.

The deputy, Vitaly Zhuravsky, who sought to make libel punishable by up to five years in jail, argued it was needed to secure the integrity of the election.

Ukraine, he said, was following the lead of Russia - though similar legislation there does not provide for any prison term.

The move raised alarm among journalists who said it would curb their ability to expose wrong-doing in high places.

"The parliamentary majority is using a law on libel as a disguise for bringing in a law on censorship," wrote Vitaly Sych, editor-in-chief of Korrespondent weekly magazine whose Sept. 28 issue carried a whited-out cover in protest at what it said was a move to gag the free press.

Though the proposed law was dropped on Oct. 2, opposition leaders expect the Regions to resurrect it if the party strengthens its position in parliament.

Early last month, Yanukovich endured an embarrassing moment when a dozen Ukrainian journalists stood up and raised anti-censorship banners as he hailed Ukraine's march to greater media freedom at a World Newspaper Congress in Kiev.

Even as he spoke, his security guards ripped banners saying "Stop censorship" from protesters' hands.

comments powered by Disqus

KyivPost

© 1995–2014 Public Media

Web links to Kyiv Post material are allowed provided that they contain a URL hyperlink to the www.kyivpost.com material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. Otherwise, all materials contained on this site are protected by copyright law and may not be reproduced without the prior written permission of Public Media at news@kyivpost.com
All information of the Interfax-Ukraine news agency placed on this web site is designed for internal use only. Its reproduction or distribution in any form is prohibited without a written permission of Interfax-Ukraine.