You're reading: Aide says Romney backs Israel if needs to strike Iran

JERUSALEM - U.S. Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney would back Israel if it were to decide it had to use military force to stop Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, a senior aide said on Sunday.

“If Israel has to take action on its own, in order to stop
Iran from developing that capability, the governor would respect
that decision,” Romney’s senior national security aide Dan Senor
told reporters travelling with the candidate.

The comment made ahead of Romney’s planned meetings in
Jerusalem with Israeli leaders seemed to differ with attempts by
President Barack Obama to convince Israel to avoid any
preemptive attack and let a regimen of international sanctions
squeeze Iran’s economy until it agrees to nuclear concessions.

Romney arrived late on Saturday on the second-leg of a
foreign trip aimed at bolstering his foreign policy credentials
in his race to unseat Obama in the Nov. 6 presidential election.

The trip has had difficulties from the start, when he
angered the British by questioning whether London was ready for
the Olympics, a statement he was forced to walk back after a
rebuke from Prime Minister David Cameron.

Romney hoped for a smoother trip in Israel even though the
region’s politics are fraught with peril.

Senor told reporters that Romney believed the threat from
Iran was approaching on a path involving two timelines.

The first was Iran’s drive – denied by Tehran – to develop a
nuclear weapons capability, and the second was having the
ability to penetrate Iran’s defences before they were hardened
in such a way to protect against a strike, Senor said.

In excepts of a speech Romney was to deliver on Monday
evening, the former Massachusetts governor planned to say that
an aggressive approach to Tehran was needed to protect against a
threat to the very existence of Israel, the closest U.S. ally in
the turbulent Middle East.

“When Iran’s leaders deny the Holocaust or speak of wiping
this nation off the map, only the naïve – or worse – will
dismiss it as an excess of rhetoric,” he would say.

“Make no mistake: the ayatollahs in Tehran are testing our
moral defences. They want to know who will object, and who will
look the other way.”