LVIV, Ukraine – Metropolitan Andrey Sheptytsky, the religious leader who headed the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church for nearly half a century, has been misunderstood through history.
Now, on the 66th anniversary of his Nov. 1, 1944, death at the age of 79, new details are emerging that challenge long-held stereotypes and provide a fuller picture of Sheptytsky’s political and civic activities as well as his views on Ukrainian statehood.
Sheptytsky was a unique leader in Ukrainian history.”
- Liliana Hentosh, a Ukrainian scholar.
“Sheptytsky was a unique leader in Ukrainian history,” said Liliana Hentosh, a Ukrainian scholar who has extensively researched the metropolitan’s life and unveiled new facts about his activities. “This was a person who can be the best example of what can be achieved by [serving] the community.”
Many Ukrainians today have largely forgotten the enormous role that Sheptytsky played, not only in the lives of their countrymen who inhabited western Ukraine -- a region historically referred to as Halychyna -- in the early 1900s, but also its events, scholars said.
“No matter where you look in Halychyna in the first half of the 20th century, he was person number one,” said Oksana Haiova, head of Religious Studies at the Lviv Central State Historical Archives. “People listened to and loved him.”
Those faded memories have allowed stereotypes, often advanced by Soviet and Polish historians as well as Ukrainians themselves, to gain ground.
As historians revisit Sheptytsky’s life, however, they are finding new materials that debunk long-held beliefs.
One of those misconceptions is that Sheptytsky was a staunch supporter of the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists, the political group which fought for Ukrainian national independence in the early part of the 20th century.
Although Sheptytsky was a supporter of Ukraine’s national movement, he was wary of OUN and many of its leaders.
His concern about the party’s radicalized message was significant enough that in 1929, Sheptytsky bought a one-third stake in Ivan Tyktor’s publishing house, one of the most important in Halychyna, said Hentosh, who recently found the document affirming the purchase.
The house published children’s materials and Novy Chas, a widely read Ukrainian-language newspaper.
Sheptytsky’s newspaper ownership helped the religious leader gain leverage in his battle with OUN. The organization had tried and failed to win over Sheptytsky with its radicalized agenda and had been using Novy Chas, Tyktor’s flagship newspaper, as a political tool. But Sheptytsky’s part-ownership of Tyktor ended all that.
He thought he wanted to be a pastor for that community. He saw God calling him to a greater goal.”
- Liliana Hentosh, a Ukrainian scholar.
“Sheptytsky took the newspaper away from OUN,” Hentosh said, adding that people forget the ferocious battle that took place in Halychyna over the hearts and minds of young people, particularly in the 1920s and 1930s.
“Sheptytsky fought for control over publications, especially children’s.”
Sheptytsky saw the conflict with OUN partly as a generational one, but his concern about its growing influence over Ukrainian youth spurred his desire to have some control over what was published.
Born in July 1865 into an aristocratic family that saw itself more as with the Polish elite than with Ukrainians, which comprised much of the lower class, Sheptytsky received his education in Krakow and Wroclaw, where he completed his doctorate in 1888.
He met with Pope Leo XIII in Italy, traveled to Kyiv, Moscow, spent several more years in study and in 1892 was ordained a priest. In 1898, Emperor Franz Joseph nominated him to fill a vacant post as the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Bishop of Stanislawow (today’s Ivano-Frankivsk); Pope Leo XIII concurred. In 1900, Sheptytsky became Metropolitan Archbishop, leading the Eastern Rite Catholics.
Early on, Sheptytsky consciously chose to serve Ruthenians, which is how ethnic Ukrainians in Halychyna identified themselves until World War I.
“He thought he wanted to be a pastor for that community,” said Hentosh. “He saw God calling him to a greater goal.”
Although he felt the product of two worlds, Polish and Ruthenian, Sheptytsky was not ready to think in strictly national terms at the beginning of the 20th century, Hentosh said.
Sheptytsky noted in a 1908 letter to a relative that he first saw himself as a transmitter of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, where the Ruthenian and Polish components of his identity were equally important.
To that end, Sheptytsky did not necessary feel Ukrainians were ready for their own state. In 1918, as the Austro-Hungarian Empire laid on the verge of collapse, he wrote that independence from Austria would be “careless and even dangerous, and first of all disadvantageous.”
When Ukrainians seized power in Lviv on Nov. 1, 1918, however, his initial response was satisfaction that the city was taken without bloodshed, Hentosh said.
He held a special mass two days later in honor of the creation of the new Western Ukrainian National Republic and his support became unequivocal.
Newly unveiled documents show the depth of Sheptytsky’s concern over the plight of western Ukrainians, particularly after WWI.
Haiova said Sheptytsky’s overriding concern, was support for poor and underprivileged elements of society, such as orphans. Many lives were in catastrophic states.
“Thousands of kids were left without parents,” Haiova said. Sheptytsky said “children don’t know how to smile…One mother wrote [him] she was happy all three of her children had died because two wouldn’t have anything to eat.”
The past ideological stereotypes that are among the Ukrainian nationalist parties get in the way of understanding the metropolitan and this includes Polish and Soviet stereotypes.”
- Ihor Smolskyi, a scholar.
Haiova, who has spent the last 20 years studying the metropolitan, said Sheptytsky was prolific. She recently helped complete a three-volume series of Sheptytsky’s pastoral letters that span from 1899 to 1944. The volumes run 3,085 pages, only a portion of his writings.
The last decade of Sheptytsky’s life was particularly challenging, scholars said. His health began to deteriorate in the mid-1930s, yet he continued to call for rationality in a society that was becoming increasingly polarized.
When OUN split into two factions in 1940, he supported its more moderate wing and called for solidarity. Throughout his tenure as church head, he denounced murder as a political weapon.
Ukrainians remain uncomfortable with Sheptytsky, said Ihor Smolskyi, a scholar who has studied the relationship between the metropolitan and the Jews.
Sheptytsky is credited with saving the lives of many Jews during World War II.
“It’s like hitting your head against the wall,” he said. “The past ideological stereotypes that are among the Ukrainian nationalist parties get in the way of understanding the metropolitan and this includes Polish and Soviet stereotypes.”
Kyiv Post staff writer Natalia A. Feduschak can be reached at feduschak@kyivpost.com.
Читайте об этом на русском языке.
He was a great man and a hero. He showed what a brave and moral person could accomplish during the Holocaust by saving his Jewish neighbors. He was unfortunately a small minority of the Ukrainian nation who allied them selves with the Nazis and murdered their Jewish neighbors who had lived among them for centuries in a hertless and brutal way. To read about his heroism and the brutality of the Ukrainian general population see The Lvov Ghetto Diary by David Kahane
Explain yourself.
Either your comment is poorly composed or you are weaving Soviet disinformation.
If you wish to speak about complicity with the Nazi's Stalin heads the list.
If you wish to speak of individual Ukrainians framed in Nazi witch hunt trials
John Demjanjuk is a contemporary example of Soviet Russian slander and intimidation.
"If you wish to speak about complicity with the Nazi's Stalin heads the list"
No sweetheart he doesn't.Munich Pact,Chamberlain ,Daladier, policy of appeasement towards Hitler,Czechoslovakia, Polish-Nazi pact .....strange words for you ? Go back to school !
John (sic!) Demjanjuk ? For God's sake he had an SS tattoo ,what Russian intimidation are you talking about ? It's not your fault though, it's your upbringing.My advise to you : Get a life !
Guest 16:21
Thank you for your disdain.
Which school should I attend, as Soviet institutions hide Russian complicity with Hitler and American have yet to deal with giving Eastern Europe to Uncle Joe in order to save England?
In Rydna Skola we studied besides Czechoslovakia, Carpatho Ukraine declaring independence under President Father Volosyn in 1939. The next day Hungary invaded which is the first act of aggression of WWII, even though academic historians such as you wish to ignore facts for contrived fiction.
Ukraine has so few matured institutions developing Rusyn educational patriotism as found in those beyond Ukraine's boarders.
Demjanjuk was fingered by the Russians to scare WWII Ukrainian refugee. They hoped to fetter the Western Ukrainian Diaspora not with the truth but intimidation of disinformation campaigns.
I do have a life developed in a homogeneous and loving background that filled in without accolades as the Ukrainian State Department during the Soviet Russian persecution. We honor the Lviv Metropolitan for starting our Greco Catholic and in turn Orthodox Church linchpin of the North American Diaspora. Metropolitan Andryj Count Sheptytsky visited us, eye-witnessed by my grandparents in 1910 and again in 1922.
Yours truly
Sweetheart 1028
Dear Guest 16:21
Forgive my faux pas...
Слава Icycy Xpucty !
God loves you too...
May the Metropolitan of Lviv bless you.
Love,
Sweetheart 10:28
Demjanjuk is an evil Nazi, not a victim. Even his family described him as a racist.
Soviet disinformation...
Moskva killed more jews than even Hitler.
QUOTE: "Although Sheptytsky was a supporter of Ukraine’s national movement, he was wary of OUN and many of its leaders"
Wow, Ms. N. Feduschak wove quite a singular eye catching kilem out of a meandering tapestry. It lost non of its Ukrainian significance while including other groups without chauvinism. With the above quote I was wondering if this iconic man was being whitewashed to fit in with the current administration agenda. He does prove leaders must be flexible as changing times create changing opportunities yet the Gospel is constant.
Of course literagists can marvel over the significance of his insistence that Rome herself cleanse the Byzantine Liturgy of the Ruthnians. There is the encyclical "Though Shall Not Kill" and so much more that could elaborate this giant. Even simple observations as he riding to visit Hutzul parishes on a white charger. This article gives validity to itself as only an introduction. The snags I saw was one use of the word kids instead of children and the popular erroneous usage of Greek Catholic for the correct English Language term Greco Catholic, liken to The Ukraine verses Ukraine.
The Metropolitan is a stunning example of a true Ukrainian role model. Can Kyiv accept it without political whitewash?
Thanks Natalia for the interesting article. Some interesting facts to think about.
a shame he is not here to offset the moskali who are in power now
But he IS.
From the turn of the XX century he dealt with the Austrian Empire, Russian Empire, Ukrainian Republic, Poland, Bolshevik Russia, Nazi Germany and Soviet Russia.
Victor II is just more stupidity and ego centric flattery.
Pray (just ask) him for help.
Ukraine needs it.
PS, What would it hurt even if you are not a believer, bit if there is?