It's beta of the site. Let us know your opinion.
Weather       +5 °C
Currency:  1USD  7.38  1EUR 9.32
Search:  
 
 Sign In   Register
Nation

Main players in Ukraine's party politics

9 October, 21:33 | Reuters
Main players in Ukraine's party politics
From left, Party of the Regions boss
Viktor Yanukovich, Prime Minister Yulia
Tymoshenko, President Victor Yushchenko
(Reuters) - Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko set a Dec. 7 date on Thursday for an early parliamentary election. Here is some background on the main players:

 

Yushchenko, Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko and opposition leader Viktor Yanukovich have dominated politics since the 2004 "Orange Revolution" - mass rallies against a rigged presidential election in which Yushchenko was eventually declared the winner.

Yanukovich was the Moscow-backed candidate in 2004 whose initial victory sparked the protests, led by Yushchenko and Tymoshenko. Political turmoil has since generated speculation that either the president or premier could join forces in parliament with Yanukovich.

Opinion polls vary widely but most have Tymoshenko and Yanukovich vying for the lead with just over 20 percent each. Yushchenko and his party trail in single figures, with some surveys crediting Our Ukraine with about 5 percent.

* YULIA TYMOSHENKO - Prime Minister (46):

-- The former gas tycoon turned social crusader was allied with Yushchenko during the 2004 revolution. Her impassioned speeches kept hundreds of thousands on the streets for weeks.

-- Yushchenko named her his first prime minister in 2005 but the honeymoon was shortlived -- he sacked her after eight months, with each side accusing the other of corruption. She was appointed a second time in December, 2007. -- Her policies include billions in compensation for depositors who lost Soviet-era savings, price controls on food to bring inflation down, calls for review of opaque privatisations, high social spending.

-- In her first tenure as premier fiery rhetoric about corruption in the gas sector pushed relations with Russia to a low and the cost of imports doubled soon after. Her opponents now accuse her of seeking Moscow's favour to win its support for a likely bid in the next presidential election in 2010. -- Her bloc is made of several parties whose heartland support is in the west of the country.

* VIKTOR YUSHCHENKO - President (54)

-- The former central bank chief and prime minister was poisoned by dioxin in the 2004 presidential campaign. His face was disfigured and he underwent a long series of operations.

-- Yushchenko has made membership of the NATO military alliance and the European Union policy cornerstones. Yushchenko is deeply religious and frequently cites Ukrainian history, particularly centuries of failure to achieve statehood.

-- Popular support for Yushchenko after his victory in the re-run 2004 election ebbed away as his aim of turning Ukraine into a modern state with a Western orientation gave way to infighting and indecision.

-- His credibility dropped further after he agreed to appoint Yanukovich prime minister in 2006 -- subject to a deal that was supposed to leave pro-Western policy goals intact. Support for Yushchenko now stands at less than 10 percent.

-- His party, Our Ukraine, has a support base in western Ukraine.

* VIKTOR YANUKOVICH - Opposition leader, former PM, (57):

-- The Moscow-backed candidate was initially declared the winner of the rigged 2004 presidential election, but lost the re-run of the poll ordered by the Supreme Court. He made a remarkable comeback in 2006 when his party finished first in a parliamentary poll and Yushchenko appointed him prime minister after "orange" parties failed to form a coalition.

-- Hailing from industrial eastern Ukraine, his Regions party is seen as representing the business interests of heavy industry oligarchs.

-- Yanukovich has warmer relations with Russia and is unenthusiastic about Yushchenko's plans to seek fast-track NATO membership. But like virtually all politicians in Ukraine, he supports further integration with the European Union.

  Comments (9)
Add your comment
Left 1000 symbols
.
Comments on page
Slave  (Guest) | 10.10.2008, 19:17
It is amazing that there are still some who continue to support this CIA operative who has repeatedly put the interest of the North Atlantic Teutonic cartel before that of the Ukrainian people. There is a reason he has virtually no support despite massive American financing and disinformation; true Ukrainians (unlike the last poster) are not idiots. Those race traders who seek to divide the Slavic Nation will join Judas Iscariot and General Vlasov in the lowest rung of hell.
Answer  
Guest  (Guest) | 10.10.2008, 19:17
Yuschenko has been on course toward NATO and European Integration. Unfortunately the political system is not mature yet and every other bum in Ukrainian politics is trying to usurp power for him/herself. Like the first reelection that was caused by Yanukovich paying off someone to join his side and therefore destabilize the ruling coalition. Of course Yuschenko had to stop that even though it would make him unpopular.

Although in the short term another reelection is a terrible situation, it will set a long term example that illegally usurping power will not work in Ukraine.
Answer  
ureshot  (Guest) | 10.10.2008, 09:16
oh my good you people are idiots. Yushchenko did disappoint with some of his decisions but he is trying to get Ukraine modernized and move towards Europe, not regressive communist state or just being used by Russia. If Ukraine will have Yanukovich as a president, it would be horrible. Moscow will take control and suck everything from Ukraine. It would attack Yalta or just will take it away peasefully. This is stupid. Those guys support moscow,k the same Moscow that attacks South Ossetia. Think before you say stuff. Besides Yanukovich and Timoshenko were in prison because they are criminals. Yanukovich is like a Ukrainian Bush - he doesn\'t even know how to give good speeches.
Answer  
Guest  (Guest) | 10.10.2008, 15:52
Please. Yushenkmo has not made any advancements of Ukraine toward Europe. All he has done is prevent Ukraine from adopting European standards of democracy.
Ukraine had a stable government in 2006/7 and Yushchenko, in order to prevent the Parliament from realising European democratic reforms, destabilised Ukraine\'s political and economic development as part of his ongoing Power Struggle. Political opportunism and heavy handed tactics by Yushchenko forced an unnecessary election that has further destabilised Ukraine. Yes... Yushchenko is very much responsible for the current situation and he should be the one that is facing the people and renewal of his mandate. But of course he dare not hold early presidential elections as was the case in Georgia. Why? because Yushchenko would lose. Yushchenko is the problem not the solution, His policies and actions do not represent or serve Ukraine\'s best interest.
Answer  
Guest  (Guest) | 10.10.2008, 16:49
THIS IS TYPICAL KGB DISINFORMATION! :(
Answer  
Guest  (Guest) | 10.10.2008, 01:11
The ongoing political crisis that has inflicted Ukraine since 2004 is the power struggle between the President and the Peoples democratically Elected Parliament.

Yushchenko, who has less then 5% support according to recent public opinion polls, has worked against European integration and opposed to Ukraine adopting a European Parliamentary system of governance since 2002.

This is the third Parliamentary election since 2006. In 2007 Yushchenko destabilised the nation by unconstitutionally dismissing the previous parliament. He illegally interfered with the independence of Ukraine\'s constitutional court in order to prevent the court from ruling against his decree.

Ukraine has had to pay the cost of Yushchenko\'s policy of division. Ukraine\'s high rate of inflation is directly related to the political instability arriving from Yushchenko\'s administration. If anyone should face the people in fresh election it is the President of Ukraine, Victor Yushchenko
Answer  
YNKY  (Guest) | 10.10.2008, 04:39
Yushcheno is puppet for the US government, He does not care about or represent Ukraine
Answer  
Guest  (Guest) | 10.10.2008, 17:19
This speech has been given about a million times and just on this site quite a few times. It must get copied and pasted underneath every article and news item whatever the subject. I\'m sure everyone who bothers reading about Ukraine in English has seen it several times. Can you not think of anything new to say?
Answer  
Sohail  (Guest) | 16.10.2008, 23:56
Ukraine is a Sovereign Nation State. Its Political parties should work for the citizens of Ukraine and to moving the nation\'s economy forward. The President was correct in calling for an election because the Parliament needs a new prospectus or manifesto that would move the country forward.
As we are all in an economic downturn, this means the government of the day has to be for the betterment of the nation state as a whole. The problem with the current Parliament is that there is too much bickering and nonsense.
When there are narrow working majorities as in the Ukrainian Parliament, it is sometimes considered better to reach concensus to areas such as renewable energy or economic modernisation and yes, of creating a better nation state on a social and economic prospectus.
It is to this effect after the people have made their considered choice, a new coalition Government would emmerge that would be able to take the country forward. A government that shall be a progressive one.
Answer  
Advertising

Most popular articles: