Weather       +5 °C
Currency:  1USD  7.64  1EUR 10.7
Search:  
 
 Sign In   Register

Kremlin hyping Georgia arms sales

23 October 2008, 11:26 | James Marson, Kyiv Post, Staff Writer
Kremlin hyping Georgia arms sales
Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin
said Ukrainian weapons were used by
Georgia to kill Russian troops.
The war of words over Ukraine’s role as one of the world’s top 10 arms exporters and in supplying weapons to Georgia is heating up.

The Ukrainian arms industry is in the firing line.

The war of words over Ukraine’s role as one of the world’s top 10 arms exporters and in supplying weapons to Georgia is heating up – at least with the Kremlin and Moscow-friendly Ukrainian lawmakers.

Results of an investigation to be made public in early November will likely take a swipe at Kyiv’s pro-Western president, Victor Yushchenko. And Russia has jumped on the recent seizure by Somali pirates of a Ukrainian ship laden with weapons to paint Ukraine as a shady arms merchant and undermine Yushchenko’s international reputation.

Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin has called Ukrainian arms deliveries to Georgia “a crime” and “an attempt to set Russians and Ukrainians against each other in armed conflict.”

Much ado about nothing, defense experts counter.

“I see no problem with the deals,” said Mykhailo Samus, assistant director of the Center for Army Conversion and Disarmament Research, a think tank based in Kyiv. “It was normal military-technical cooperation between two independent states.”

Top Russian officials and members of the Ukrainian parliament’s temporary investigatory commission into the deliveries to Georgia have accused Yushchenko of actively supporting the Georgian attack on South Ossetia. Put more harshly, Moscow accuses Yushchenko of participating in the killing of Russian soldiers by delivering huge numbers of weapons in the run-up to the four day war in August.

Also nonsense, presidential allies say, citing Kremlin hypocrisy in supplying more arms to Georgia than Ukraine.

The international arms transfers database of the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute records a significant increase in deliveries from Ukraine to Georgia, starting in 2004, according to information through 2007. Deliveries include tanks, helicopters, surface-to-air missile systems and anti-tank missiles.

Unofficially, pro-Kremlin Russian newspaper Izvestia produced a table detailing a massive increase in deliveries for 2007 and, especially, mid-2008, including tanks, Grad multiple rocket launching systems and machine guns.

Ihor Alekseyev, a Rada deputy from the Communist Party and the special investigation commission’s deputy chairman, said he has the proof.

“We have documents that show that from May to July 2008 there was intensive delivery of weapons to Georgia. The conclusion from this is that he [Yushchenko] knew what was being prepared [the Georgian attack on South Ossetia],” Alekseyev said. The six-member panel includes no presidential allies.

More nonsense, say independent arms experts.

The deliveries are “not evidence that the Ukrainians knew of a plan for Georgia to act against south Ossetia at the beginning of August,” said Paul Holtom, a Ukrainian arms trade expert at the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. “With no arms embargo in place, the delivery of weapons is a matter of agreement between the exporting country and the purchaser.”

Holtom said Ukraine and Georgia have had arms deals going for the last few years, officially reporting transfers to the United Nations and in Ukrainian national export reports.

Ukraine inherited huge stockpiles of weapons when the Soviet Union split in 1991. Export revenues have hit $1 billion annually.

Besides selling off old Soviet weapons, Ukrainian companies also manufacture parts, including engines for Chinese airplanes and Russian helicopters.

Serhiy Bondarchuk, director of state-owned arms exporter Ukrspetsexport, said that the share of the Ukrainian-Georgian military-technical collaboration reached 6 percent last year, while the Russian-Georgian military figure was 28 percent. Moreover, Ukraine in recent years has exported much more to Moscow than to Tbilisi. Experts estimate that Russia accounts for around 25 percent of Ukraine’s arms exports.

Nevertheless, Alekseev accused Yushchenko of secretly selling the Buk-M1, a Russian-made, surface-to-air missile system. The weapon was reportedly used to shoot down Russian planes over Georgia. Putin has also claimed that Ukrainian personnel were in Georgia operating the weapons.

Anatoly Hrytsenko, chairman of the parliamentary committee on security and defense and former defense minster, said his committee investigated many of these claims in August and “discovered that [Ukraine] did not deliver many of the weapons they accused us of delivering.”

Although Alekseyev’s special investigation commission is due to present its findings on Nov. 6, many have been leaked to the press, giving further ammunition to those who say politics is behind the probe.

“I am skeptical about the professional level of the commission,” said Kyrylo Kulikov, a lawmaker within the pro-presidential bloc and former Interpol chief in Ukraine.

Alekseyev complained that the commission’s work had been hindered at all levels of government.

He also criticized lack of transparency in the arms industry. “We have a very different system [of arms exports] from any other civilized country in the world. There is a direct vertical line from the president,” Alekseyev said.

The nation’s arms export industry has been at the center of international scandals before, most notably in 2002 when the United States accused Ukraine of selling radar systems to Iraq. In the 1990s, weapons were delivered to Liberia in defiance of a United Nations embargo.

A similar suspicion was voiced again recently after Somali pirates seized a Ukrainian vessel transporting Soviet-era T-72 tanks, spare parts and ammunition to Kenya on Sept. 25. Some media reports have alleged that the tanks were in fact heading for South Sudan.

Ukrainian officials and its arms exporter denied wrongdoing and said Kenya was the final destination.

The Kyiv Post is hosting comments and forums to foster lively debate. Criticism is fine, but stick to the issues. Comments that include profanity or personal attacks will be removed from the site. If you think that a posted comment violates these standards, please flag it and alert us. We will take steps to block violators.
Please sign in or register to add a new comment
  Comments (5)
FromUSAwithLove    (Guest) | 25.10.2008, 07:34
What\'s bothering Putin and Medvedev, is that Ukraine and Georgia were elected in big part because of financial support from United States. One of these leaders started a military offencive against an ethnic group and other was supplying the offensive with weapons. As everybody knows US was also supporting Mujahadeen movement, that later became Taliban, and Saddam Hussein was elected with JFK\'s help in 1963. So why would Russia sit back and watch these war games play out on it\'s boarders. I do not blame Russian government one little bit for its war of words in oposition to Ukraine\'s government\'s policies.

If Ukraine becomes too hostile to Russia, Russia can make a hell of a case to annex Cremia, as Cremia became part of Ukraine in 1954 and was never part of Ukraine before that. The West applied pre-Molotov-Ribentrov map to all of the countries of former Soviet Union except Ukraine. If these internationally recognized standards applied towards Ukraine, Crimea would be part of Russia
Guest    (Guest) | 27.10.2008, 22:10
Putin is just crying that the weapons systems used against his airplanes were so effectively and effortlessly shot down. It did cost little Russia a couple of million dollars for those planes and with a plummeting stock market and oil, there are not the funds flowing through the Kremlin like there used to be to replace them. That\'s the cost of war, if you don\'t like then you should have used South Ossetia and Abkhazia\'s air power. Oh wait, they don\'t have one.
Guest    (Guest) | 24.10.2008, 20:42
Pathetic. Putin is so transparent here. Trying to develop basis for aggressive action against Ukraine. Also rile the pro Russian portion of Ukraine populations with lies and innuendo in the middle of national election crisis.

I am not in favor of vast arms dealing by many nations .. and Russia is toward top of this list, along with China, USA and others.

But Putin is about power, pure and simple (KGB guy, smart, ruthless, and cultivates is image). He and his cronies. He could care less about people he purports to care for. Putin brutally suppresses opposition in Russia (including killing journalists, stamping out threats from groups such as Chechans). Uses oil, gas, and pipeline control to extort and punish peoples.

Look in the mirrow P.M. Putin. You might not like what u see.
Guest    (Guest) | 23.10.2008, 14:10
More provacations by dictator Putin to undermine Ukraine and Georgias efforts to free themselves from Russias grip! Russia is the biggest shady supplier of arms in this part of the world, they even sell arms to Iran and some African nations to support terrorists!
Guest    (Guest) | 24.10.2008, 07:45
Hell, Russia is covering up that they sold arms to Georgia. The Kremlin would sell arms to Siberian separatist and then invade themselves to stimulate their economy.
Advertising

MOST POPULAR ARTICLES: