Read more in section
OP-ED Moscow Times opinion: Very little to celebrate Yesterday at 00:42
OP-ED The Trumpet: Wary view of democracy in Eastern bloc Two days ago at 09:59
Editorial Really sick Three days ago at 21:27
Editorial Bad medicine Three days ago at 21:24
OP-ED Prevention missing in health-care remedies Three days ago at 21:22
OP-ED Flu panic stoked by political malpractice Three days ago at 21:12
OP-ED Vox Populi with Kateryna Grushenko Three days ago at 21:07
Letters to the Editor Harvard Crimson letter: Swine flu infecting politics Three days ago at 11:43
OP-ED Jamestown Foundation: Electoral populism in Ukraine prevails over economic wisdom Three days ago at 07:41
Most popular Opinion
Cure needed, not relief
October 24, 2007 at 21:47 | Editorialdence Ukraine still suffers from an inefficient and often deadly Soviet-era infrastructure. But responses to the tragedy show that officials and businessmen still suffer from a Soviet mindset. The central government was right to step in with Hr 94 million (nearly $19 million) and everyone who made donations, from Lviv to Luhansk, should be commended.
But President Viktor Yushchenko had to personally go to Dnipropetrovsk and shame local officials and owners of the company Dniprogaz before they even suggested bearing responsibility for the tragedy.
In the end, Ukrainian-born Russian billionaire Viktor Vekselberg said that his structures would pay out $100,000 to each of the families of the 23 people who perished in the tragedy, while surviving victims (18 of whom were still in hospital on Oct. 22) would split an additional $5 million, according to Ukrainian media reports.
The president also had to ask the businessman to restore natural gas service to all 5,000 buildings that had their supplies cut off as a result of the accident. Yushchenko is right in talking about utility concessions to businesses – market players will be more interested in making utilities efficient and safe, especially if they carry liability.
The country’s opaque energy sector needs greater transparency. Massive profits are earned by obscure offshore entities that feed like parasites on the dilapidated state infrastructure. They rarely re-invest in the Soviet-era gas network.
In the short term, the state should consider breaking up privately-owned monopolies of the energy distribution networks. Instead, investors should be lured to produce more energy in the country and offered the chance to sell it down the chain on a transparent market with bidding, such as seen on energy markets in Europe.
When this happens, and a proper corporate culture is established, the state can tender off management of its natural monopoly infrastructure to private interests capable of managing it better.
The solution is in fixing the system, not providing relief: No matter how big the bandages are, they will not return the lives lost on Oct. 13.