Read more in section
OP-ED England fans are coming! Yesterday at 18:29
Editorial Intolerance 2 days ago at 20:04
OP-ED Back Story: How to behave with press 2 days ago at 19:58
OP-ED Soccer games may be Yanukovych’s disaster 2 days ago at 19:49
OP-ED Government must act to bolster confidence in banking sector 2 days ago at 19:40
OP-ED Vox Populi with Maryna Irkliyenko: Do you think sexual minorities should have the same rights as heterosexuals? 2 days ago at 19:28
OP-ED New Eastern Europe: Half a Europe away 2 days ago at 14:57
OP-ED Digital Tonto: Social networks and consumer targeting 2 days ago at 11:55
Letters to the Editor Taxi ripoffs at the airport 3 days ago at 18:07
Most popular Opinion
Putin’s soft spot
Dec 26, 2007 at 22:09 | Editorialine’s 2007 Person of the Year. Basking in the glory of international recognition, Putin reminded Yushchenko that the Kremlin is upset with the way Ukraine is treating its common history with Russia.
In the Time magazine interview, Putin foretold Ukraine’s destruction because Washington categorizes Ukraine’s elites as either “pro-American” or “pro-Russian.” Putin called this a mistake, claiming “all of them have to be Ukrainian nationalists in the positive sense of the term.” “Everything that took place” since the Orange Revolution was in violation of the Constitution, Putin said.
Putin said 17 million Ukrainian citizens are ethnic Russians, when the reality is that 7.8 million, not the 38 percent that he alleged, claim Russian heritage. Revealing chauvinism, he said “almost 100 percent” of Ukrainians consider Russian their native language. He might as well have declared Ukrainian a dead language.
However, in his letter to Yushchenko, Putin betrayed a significant soft spot in the Kremlin’s quest to keep Ukraine obedient. He left out an issue that the Kremlin has consistently hammered at earlier; namely, referring to the Holodomor as genocide against Ukrainians. Apparently, Putin preferred not to mention the issue in his letter as one belonging to a “common history.”
Rather than lecturing Ukrainians, Putin might lead Russians by taking Kyiv’s example and declassifying Soviet archives. Russia claims that famine was forced upon its people as well. But how? The outside world, and more importantly, the Russian people, will not know until the archives are open.
Western policymakers, like Time magazine, should call upon Putin to open up the archives of the Soviet secret police that he served and headed. This should be a condition of Russia’s G-8 membership. In doing so in 2008, Putin has every chance of retaining his most important person status, and this time, for all the right reasons.