Read more in section
OP-ED EU integration and Ukraine: next steps? 2 days ago at 18:19
OP-ED DigitalJournal.com: Is Putin the only way? 2 days ago at 17:17
Editorial Gangland 3 days ago at 22:10
Editorial On our own 3 days ago at 22:04
OP-ED Back Story: Reporting fairly on the president 3 days ago at 21:53
OP-ED US, EU may want to consider visa bans 3 days ago at 21:43
OP-ED Ukraine’s energy business ‘optimized for corruption’ 3 days ago at 21:38
OP-ED Tymoshenko’s daughter calls on Americans to speak out for democracy 3 days ago at 21:22
OP-ED Vox Populi with Mark Rachkevych: How has the worsening of relations between Ukraine and the West affected your life in general, personally or professionally? 3 days ago at 21:01
Most popular Opinion
Let’s debate the issues
May 7, 2008 at 23:27 | Editorialrous television and newspaper outlets he controls and manipulates, Leonid Chernovetskiy has been a swell and dandy mayor.
Vitali Klitschko is strong and honest. But Kyiv needs a “wise mayor,” and Oleksandr Turchynov apparently fits that bill. And “it won’t be shameful” to have Mykola Katernychuk as mayor (we don’t doubt it).
While simple slogans, plastered on every other Kyiv street corner and along highways, are effective in conveying basic messages that appeal to people’s emotions and perhaps even the subconscious, Kyiv voters need more.
The candidates have given out campaign booklets, which offer a basic outline of their goals, and voters with Internet access can examine the voting records of the candidates and their respective political forces for some idea of what their true intentions are.
But a good old-fashioned debate is in order.
So far, the candidates are scheduled to present their campaign platforms during daily television broadcasts at 22:15 on Kyiv public television between May 7 and 21.
While beneficial, it’s not a debate, where candidates demonstrate whether they’re truly in command of the issues and capable of communicating effectively, or whether they’re empty suits.
Of course, with 79 official candidates, the debates would need to be limited to the top contenders, which could be determined by an independent poll sponsored by a Western non-government organization.
Then we’ll get a better idea of who’s the most honest and wisest candidate for whom it won’t be shameful to vote for.