Read more in section
OP-ED Moscow Times opinion: Very little to celebrate Yesterday at 00:42
OP-ED The Trumpet: Wary view of democracy in Eastern bloc Two days ago at 09:59
Editorial Really sick Three days ago at 21:27
Editorial Bad medicine Three days ago at 21:24
OP-ED Prevention missing in health-care remedies Three days ago at 21:22
OP-ED Flu panic stoked by political malpractice Three days ago at 21:12
OP-ED Vox Populi with Kateryna Grushenko Three days ago at 21:07
Letters to the Editor Harvard Crimson letter: Swine flu infecting politics Three days ago at 11:43
OP-ED Jamestown Foundation: Electoral populism in Ukraine prevails over economic wisdom Three days ago at 07:41
Most popular Opinion
A call for consensus
May 15, 2008 at 03:31 | Editorialeconstruction and Development (EBRD) last hosted its Board of Governors meeting here. Much progress has been made politically and economically.
The country weathered a political revolution in 2004 and the electorate rallied behind the Orange leadership to reject authoritarian rule and embrace representative democracy. As Kamen Zahariev said in his interview with the Post, Ukraine’s voters will never accept a dictatorship again.
The economy is booming and a consumer culture is rapidly developing. Kyiv’s gridlocked streets are evidence of the population’s growing affluence, Only 10 years ago, traffic jams were unheard of and taxis could whisk their passengers across the city regardless of the time of day.
Despite the admirable progress, much critical work is left unfinished.
Ukraine’s political gridlock is as bad as the traffic on Kyiv’s streets. It’s holding up critical reforms needed to complete Ukraine’s full transition and end the decades-long post-Soviet hangover.
The country's leaders need to to reach what EBRD President Jean Lemierre referred to as a “constitutional consensus,” and finally settle the rules of the game of how the country is governed, administered and managed.
Out of the consensus will flow the long-delayed reforms needed to unlock Ukraine's potential.
Land use and registry reform would finally allow Ukrainian and foreign investors to tap into Ukraine’s obvious comparative advantage in all agricultural sectors.
A joint stock company law to protect minority shareholders’ rights would encourage heretofore hesitant investors to enter Ukraine’s marketplace and capital markets.
A reformed, well-defined, nonpartisan judicial system would curtail corruption, benefiting foreign investors and Ukrainians alike.
Banking and tax reform would foster the growth of Ukraine’s underdeveloped small- and medium- enterprises and begin forming a domestic capital market. Ukraine’s leaders need to end the gridlock and secure lasting political stability.