Read more in section
OP-ED England fans are coming! Yesterday at 18:29
Editorial Intolerance 2 days ago at 20:04
OP-ED Back Story: How to behave with press 2 days ago at 19:58
OP-ED Soccer games may be Yanukovych’s disaster 2 days ago at 19:49
OP-ED Government must act to bolster confidence in banking sector 2 days ago at 19:40
OP-ED Vox Populi with Maryna Irkliyenko: Do you think sexual minorities should have the same rights as heterosexuals? 2 days ago at 19:28
OP-ED New Eastern Europe: Half a Europe away 2 days ago at 14:57
OP-ED Digital Tonto: Social networks and consumer targeting 2 days ago at 11:55
Letters to the Editor Taxi ripoffs at the airport 3 days ago at 18:07
Most popular Opinion
Who is Akhmetov?
Aug 20, 2008 at 18:36 | Editorialwe have posed this question, nor will it be the last. As the richest man in Ukraine, worth an estimated $33 billion, and a prime backer of the Moscow-leaning Regions Party headed by Victor Yanukovych, Akhmetov has more than his fair share of influence in Ukraine. We have been told many times that he is a pragmatic businessman who cares deeply for Ukraine and actively helps the country through charity. We have been told that he is a close friend and ally of Ukraine’s pro-Western president, Victor Yushchenko, and supports Western integration.
Yet the facts tell a different story.
On August 15, in the heat of bloody Russian-Georgian military standoff, the Donetsk City Council controlled by the Regions Party took sides with Russia by adopting a resolution condemning the “aggression of Georgia’s leadership” against South Ossetia.
While Akhmetov has himself been silent on this issue, the party he exerts so much influence over is taking sides with the Kremlin. Such a position is not helpful to Ukraine, which, in Crimea, might be the next target of Moscow’s attempts to stir up secessionist sentiment.
Could the Regions Party once again, as in Orange Revolution days, fuel separatist tensions in Ukraine? Are these politicians playing to their electorate or acting as part of a Kremlin plan? Does Akhmetov support this? Will his television channel again be used as a mouthpiece for separatist movements in Ukraine? These are valid questions, since Akhmetov has yet to show he is acting in Ukraine’s best interests.
Akhmetov must make his position clear. If his position on such a crucial issue differs from that of the Regions Party, then he has no place in this party. He should stay out of politics or join a pro-Ukrainian party. If not, then he is exacerbating Ukraine's problems. Finally, Yushchenko should reconsider his relations with Akhmetov and end the fighting with Tymoshenko, whom he has accused in recent days of siding with the Kremlin. The threat does not appear to be Tymoshenko, who has -- contrary to claims by Yushchenko’s administration -- expressed solidarity with Georgia. From our vantage point, the greater danger is posed by Akhmetov.