Read more in section
Editorial Gangland Yesterday at 22:10
Editorial On our own Yesterday at 22:04
OP-ED Back Story: Reporting fairly on the president Yesterday at 21:53
OP-ED US, EU may want to consider visa bans Yesterday at 21:43
OP-ED Ukraine’s energy business ‘optimized for corruption’ Yesterday at 21:38
OP-ED Tymoshenko’s daughter calls on Americans to speak out for democracy Yesterday at 21:22
OP-ED Vox Populi with Mark Rachkevych: How has the worsening of relations between Ukraine and the West affected your life in general, personally or professionally? Yesterday at 21:01
OP-ED EurActiv: A win-win for EU and Ukraine Yesterday at 16:33
OP-ED Digital Tonto: Why I still think the New York Times paywall is stupid 2 days ago at 16:24
Most popular Opinion
Smelly land deals
Sep 3, 2008 at 23:58 | EditorialThe decision took the public by surprise, just like the land grab of 2007 that saw 300 plots worth billions of dollars doled out for a fraction of their truth worth. All of a sudden, four percent of the city’s land changed hands in a blink of an eye.
Once again, establishing who the new landlords are and whether they paid market price is difficult. Conveniently, the Kyiv City Council approved a resolution in 2004 that only allows release of such information with the permission of those involved. The latest land sale came as the Supreme Court passed judgments that legitimized the October sale.
The city’s power brokers are free to do whatever they please. More controversial land decisions should be expected unless the public demands transparent sales. In a city where corruption is widespread, public land scarce and property disputes sometimes bloody, public tenders, meetings and records will ensure clear and fair transfer of ownership. City coffers, not private pockets, need to be filled.