Read more in section
OP-ED Moscow Times opinion: Very little to celebrate Yesterday at 00:42
OP-ED The Trumpet: Wary view of democracy in Eastern bloc Two days ago at 09:59
Editorial Really sick Three days ago at 21:27
Editorial Bad medicine Three days ago at 21:24
OP-ED Prevention missing in health-care remedies Three days ago at 21:22
OP-ED Flu panic stoked by political malpractice Three days ago at 21:12
OP-ED Vox Populi with Kateryna Grushenko Three days ago at 21:07
Letters to the Editor Harvard Crimson letter: Swine flu infecting politics Three days ago at 11:43
OP-ED Jamestown Foundation: Electoral populism in Ukraine prevails over economic wisdom Three days ago at 07:41
Most popular Opinion
Immoral clause
November 19, 2008 at 20:05 | EditorialThe government wants mass media outlets to sign a “civil agreement” that would set a framework for the protection of public morals. The initiative is being promoted by the National Council for TV and Radio and the National Commission to Protect Social Morals, an agency that analyzes the “decency” of media content. Basically, the government is asking the media to dig its own grave.
Undoubtedly, media in Ukraine should be governed by laws as well as internal standards and principles. Of course, news and advertising content should be decent. But signing dubious agreements with government agencies that have a right to shut media outlets is the same as giving them a pretext to do so.
Ukraine’s Constitution guarantees freedom of speech. But it also says this right can be limited to protect national security or civil order, public health and sensitive information. Similar laws exist in many nations. One such law was used by a Russian prosecutor last week to warn Russian Newsweek because of an edition that contained information deemed to incite Muslims and Christians. When vague laws cite “inter-ethnic or inter-religious hostilities,” “national security” or “civil order,” they are ripe for abuse. Ukrainian law already gives the government too many levers with which to exert control over the media. The government does not need to invent new ones.