Read more in section
OP-ED EU integration and Ukraine: next steps? 3 days ago at 18:19
OP-ED DigitalJournal.com: Is Putin the only way? 3 days ago at 17:17
Editorial Gangland Feb 9 at 22:10
Editorial On our own Feb 9 at 22:04
OP-ED Back Story: Reporting fairly on the president Feb 9 at 21:53
OP-ED US, EU may want to consider visa bans Feb 9 at 21:43
OP-ED Ukraine’s energy business ‘optimized for corruption’ Feb 9 at 21:38
OP-ED Tymoshenko’s daughter calls on Americans to speak out for democracy Feb 9 at 21:22
OP-ED Vox Populi with Mark Rachkevych: How has the worsening of relations between Ukraine and the West affected your life in general, personally or professionally? Feb 9 at 21:01
Most popular Opinion
The New Yorker: A date that will live in oblivion
Sep 2, 2010 at 04:59What President Obama called the end of the combat mission in Iraq is a meaningless milestone, constructed almost entirely out of thin air, and his second Oval Office speech marks a rare moment of dishonesty and disingenuousness on the part of a politician who usually resorts to rare candor at important moments. The fifty thousand troops who will remain in Iraq until the end of next year will still be combat troops in everything but name, because they will be aiding one side in an active war zone. The proclaimed end of Operation Iraqi Freedom has little or nothing to do with the military and political situation in Iraq, which is why Iraqis were barely aware when the last U.S. combat brigade crossed into Kuwait a few days ago. Read the story here.