

Ukrainians abroad strive to keep alive cultural traditions of the homeland
Yanukovych: Companies' privatization in Ukraine should be completed by 2014
Council of Europe calls for stricter supervision of political funding in Ukraine
Expats To Watch: Back in Ukraine to spur sales for Concorde Capital
Vox Populi with Daryna Shevchenko: How do you feel about the Orange Revolution?
Klitschko: My ‘new fight’ is to stop Ukraine from ‘sliding into tyranny’
Shell Oil Products Ukraine becomes exclusive supplier of lubricants to Bogdan-Auto Holding
Nestle, Kyiv Post launch “You Are What You Eat” photo contest
Azarov: Ukraine's observer status in Customs Union won't affect association agreement with EU
The Algemenier: Svoboda Fuels Ukraine’s Growing Anti-Semitism
Soccer-Zenit Poised To Re-Sign Tymoshchuk, Say 'Nyet' To Arshavin
The main root of Ukraine's problems lie in the presidential system. Ukraine must address this fundamental issue of concern. As long as Ukraine remains beholden to presidential rule it will never be a Free independent democratic state. Until the opposition wake up and realise that the presidential system is the basis of most of Ukraine's problems their is little hope for any change other then ongoing political discontent. Constitutional and judicial reform must become central to Ukraine's political agenda before any meaningful change can occur.
The choice is simple. Retain the soviet presidential system and continue to be subject to authoritarian rule or embrace a democratic European parliamentary model of governance and accept collective responsibility for Ukraine's future.
The recent forced constitutional changes and proposed electoral reforms to the parliament are a backward step. The fact that the opposition had not opposed these changes provides little comfort or confidence that there will be any meaningful change in the near future.
Time for you to get a day job.
The last thing Ukraine needs is to pursue or adopt a US model of government. let alone primaries. Ukraine MUST look to Europe, and adopt European model and European standards.
It cost 100's of millions of dollars to run a presidential system campaign. Only the rich and the powerful can afford to sustain such a campaign.
Ukraine needs to embrace representative government and develop coalitions of common interests. This is best achieved though a full parliamentary model of democracy. Estonia and Latvia correctly adopted a parliamentary model when they declared independence from the Soviet Union. Estonian and Latvia along with a host of other states have succeeded where Ukraine has not. Their success is primarily due to the stability and collective responsibility that forms a basis of a parliamentary system.
The presidential system to the contrary has divided Ukraine and concentrated power into the hand of one individual. It is the root of Ukraine's failure and ongoing political crises.
In 2004 the main achievement of the Orange revolution was the fundamental shift aware from Presidential authority.
The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe and the Venice Commission have both correctly called on Ukraine to adopt a full parliamentary model of reform.
If Ukraine wants to be a part of Europe then it must take its lead from Europe and its neighbouring states not the USA.
You are such a drag with all this bogus stuff about parliamentary vs presidential.
You don't have a clue as to what you're talking about, but you keep posting this same old crap post after post, even making up different names to support your ridiculousness. Haven't you got a better thing to do other than to post nonsense?
It is the rules and the rulers and as to whether they will enforce the rules that determines the type of govt you have.
You weren't allowed to say much in 2004 with the Kuchma regime...so...maybe this is just the way it started back then?
The scary thing is how vicious will Yanu's attack be on them?
Will there be enough in the military, police and secret service to protect them?
I fear Yanu's attack on the demonstrators, but at the very least it will show the West what he is and they will probably react against this govt.
The new election law may work in opposition's favor. Why should the 20% of the population that are authoritarian, Communist and Soviet rule over the 80% of the population that is democracy and freedom oriented? Democracy and freedom oriented parties should agree to always vote and to vote only for any democracy oriented candidate that is available if someone from their own party is unavailable and to never, never, never vote for an authoritarian, Soviet or Communist oriented candidate. It would be so simple.
Yanukovych and the Party of Regions are authoritarian, corrupt, falsely persecuting the democratic opposition, disrespect Ukrainian language, culture and history, suppressing freedom of speech and freedom of press and dividing the wealth and business opportunities in Ukraine among themselves.
Remember as Stalin said...It is not who votes that counts, but who counts the votes.
Remember also the falsified election in 2004 that was overturned.
Remember also that Yanu has far more control than in 2004.
Quote from Democratic..."Democracy and freedom oriented parties should agree to always vote and to vote only for any democracy oriented candidate that is available"
Thanks to Yush & Yats efforts, what you wanted did not happen and now Ukraine has an authoritarian govt. To me, they are among the utmost traitors of Ukraine.
Only allow retired persons to serve in Rada.