

Ukraine Former Interior Minister Yuriy Lutsenko
© AP
European Court of Human Rights has 10,000 claims against Ukraine
European Court obliges Kyiv to pay EUR 39,000 to three Ukrainians
Penitentiary service: Health Ministry's recommendations for Lutsenko to be realized in prison
Freedom House calls on Kyiv to allow jailed opposition figures to run for election
BBC News: Ukraine Lutsenko arrest 'violated rights', says court
Freedom House urges Ukraine to investigate attack on journalists, bring attackers to justice
UNESCO headquarters in Paris to put Petrykivka paintings on display
Simon Smith hopes for proper investigation into beating of journalists in Kyiv on May 18
Ukraine plans to bid to host the European Athletics Team Championship 2017
Findings show Klitschko gaining ground on Yanukovych in polls
Ukraine exports electricity worth $193 m in four months of 2013
Ukravtodor might give up building new large-scale road infrastructure objects
Rezidor Hotel Group opens second stage of Radisson Resort & SPA hotel in Alushta
yanuconvict and his thieving banda regione care nothing for justice, only corruption and power
yanuslimeovych/krook/konvict/idiot.......is a dictator......who does as he pleases......
Who is to blame......him ,,,,,,,,or ,,,,,,,,,us ???
If we don't change him,,,,,,,,he will continue his rape of Ukraine !
.
What's interesting is that this is a preliminary judgement on proceedings and not the substance of the allegations made against Lutsenko. Lutsenko's appeal rights within Ukraine are still pending and as such the ECHR can not address the substantive allegations. This is in effect. Warning shot across the bow. In many courts of law a serious flaw in th execution of justice would render the charges laid invalid. it is clear from this judgement that Lutsenko's rights have been denied, He should not have been detained during the pre trial conclusion.
It is unclear if the court can take the same approach to Tymoshenko's imprisonment as her detention was based on an act of contempt of court. The ECHR could consider the treatment dished out to Tymoshenko to be excessive and lacking merit or justification. It could also consider her actions during the trial to be in contempt of court. There are few western judges that would tolerate her behaviour in her trial. It is incumbent of Ukraine to ensure that Lutsenko's and Tymoshenko's appeal rights within Ukraine are considered and dealt with without delay.
There is no doubt the detention of Tymoshenko was also unjustified from a legal point of view. That she didn't rise in court, didn't address Kireev as "Your honor" and made disrepectful remarks about the trial and trial participants are not among the legal reasons for detention according to Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights.