KyivPost

Tymoshenko deserves Nobel Peace Prize

Print version
July 21, 2012, 8:48 p.m. | Op-ed — by Marco Levytsky


© Courtesy

Marco Levytsky

Marco Levytsky is the editor and publisher of Ukrainian News, a bi-weekly newspaper distributed across Canada.

Many historic precedents exist to honor struggles for democracy and human rights.

Viktor Yanukovych regime’s spin doctors have reacted in typical fashion to the nomination earlier this year of Yulia Tymoshenko for the Nobel Peace Prize. (The prize is awarded annually on Dec. 10).

Politics should not play a role in this award, huffed Yanukovych’s advisor Dmytro Vidrin in an interview with Radio Svoboda.

What Vidrin is apparently unaware of, or deliberately ignoring, is that politics have played a critical role in Nobel Peace Prize awards, especially since 1960. This is particularly true where an individual or organization is fighting for basic human rights against an oppressive regime, or regimes. And in awarding these individuals, what the Nobel Peace Prize Committee has been doing is bringing world attention to their causes. Thus the Tymoshenko nomination fits in perfectly with the historic precedents.

    Here are just some of the most glaring examples:

    • 1960: Albert Lutuli, South Africa; president of the African National Congress. “Was in the very forefront of the struggle against apartheid in South Africa.” World attention began focusing on South Africa’s policy of apartheid that year. By giving the prize to its most prominent opponent at that time, the committee was giving the South African government a slap in the face and making a strong statement against apartheid.

    • 1964: Martin Luther King, Jr., United States; campaigner for civil rights, “first person in the Western world to have shown us that a struggle can be waged without violence.” In this particular case the Nobel Committee was sending a message to the governments of the Southern United States where Blacks faced the local version of apartheid, known as segregation and were denied even the most basic of democratic rights – namely the right to vote. A year after King’s award, the U.S. Congress passed the Voting Rights Act which outlawed the Southern “Jim Crow” laws and returned the right to vote to millions of disenfranchised African-Americans. This led to the end of legalized segregation and changed the political landscape of the South forever.

    • 1975: Andrei Dmitrievich Sakharov, Soviet Union; “[for his] struggle for human rights, for disarmament, and for cooperation between all nations”. By awarding the Soviet Union’s most noted dissident, the committee was once again sending a message in defence of human rights. A year after Sakharov’s award, Jimmy Carter was elected President of the United States. (The newly-enfranchised African-Americans of the South played a key role in his victory). Carter became the first U.S. President to make human rights the cornerstone of his policy towards the Soviet Union. Within the next 15 years the dissidents temporarily triumphed and the USSR collapsed in 1991, only to be revived today under Putin, Yanukovych and company. (Carter incidentally was the 2002 laureate “for his decades of untiring effort to find peaceful solutions to international conflicts, to advance democracy and human rights, and to promote economic and social development”.)

    • 1977: Amnesty International, United Kingdom; “[for] protecting the human rights of prisoners of conscience”. In awarding the organization most prominent in the defense of human rights the Nobel Committee was once more making a statement on that issue.

    • 1980: Adolfo Pérez Esquivel, Argentina; Human rights leader; “founded non-violent human rights organizations to fight the military junta that was ruling his country (Argentina).” Again a statement directly aimed at an oppressive regime that tortured its dissidents. Within two years the Argentinean junta collapsed and democracy was restored to that country.

    • 1983: Lech Walesa, Poland; “Founder of Solidarność; campaigner for human rights”. Coming fresh on the heels of the declaration of martial law in Communist Poland Walesa’s award was a strong statement supporting the democratization of his country. Within six years Communism collapsed, democracy was instituted and in 1990 Walesa became the first democratically elected President of Poland.

    • 1984: Desmond Tutu, South Africa; Bishop of Johannesburg; former Secretary General, South African Council of Churches. Yet another strike against apartheid. Once the policy was finally brought to a close and Blacks granted their democratic rights, the committee recognized this by jointly awarding recently-released Black leader Nelson Mandela and then-Prime Minister of South Africa, Frederik Willem de Klerk, “for their work for the peaceful termination of the apartheid regime, and for laying the foundations for a new democratic South Africa” in 1993.

    • 1989: Tenzin Gyatso, 14th Dalai Lama, Tibet; “In his struggle for the liberation of Tibet [he] consistently has opposed the use of violence. He has instead advocated peaceful solutions based upon tolerance and mutual respect in order to preserve the historical and cultural heritage of his people.” A statement condemning the oppression of the people of Tibet by Communist China.

    • 1991: Aung San Suu Kyi, Burma; “for her non-violent struggle for democracy and human rights”. The leading voice of the pro-democracy movement opposing her country’s military junta, Suu Kyi was under house arrest at the time of her award. She was released only in 2010.

    • 1992: Rigoberta Menchú, Guatemala; “[for] her work for social justice and ethno-cultural reconciliation based on respect for the rights of indigenous peoples.”

   • 2000: Kim Dae-jung, South Korea; “for his work for democracy and human rights in South Korea and in East Asia in general, and for peace and reconciliation with North Korea in particular.”

    • 2003: Shirin Ebadi, Iran: “for her efforts for democracy and human rights. She has focused especially on the struggle for the rights of women and children.”

    • 2010: Liu Xiaobo, China; “for his long and non-violent struggle for fundamental human rights in China”. Liu is the third person to be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize while in prison or detention, after Germany’s Carl von Ossietzky (1935) and Burma’s Aung San Suu Kyi (1991). Liu is also the second person (the first being Ossietzky) to be denied the right to have a representative collect the Nobel prize for him.

    There are other examples we could use, but these are some of the most obvious precedents.

    As the most prominent of all the political prisoners jailed by the Yanukovych regime, Tymoshenko has become a symbol of the struggle for the return of democracy in Ukraine. On that basis she deserves the Nobel Peace Prize. So let us be clear on this issue. This nomination is not about her as an individual, but about what she represents — to repeat — nothing less than the struggle for democracy and human rights in Ukraine.

Marco Levytsky is the editor and publisher of Ukrainian News, an independent bi-weekly newspaper based in Edmonton and distributed across Canada.

The Kyiv Post is hosting comments to foster lively debate. Criticism is fine, but stick to the issues. Comments that include profanity or personal attacks will be removed from the site. If you think that a posted comment violates these standards, please flag it and alert us. We will take steps to block violators.
Mykhayl July 21, 2012, 11:16 p.m.    

Слава Icy~

1966 Vasyl Stus of Donetsk' was to be awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature but, his dearth occurred before the award was announced. It is well known the Nobel is not awarded posthumously. Mr Stus was a political prisoner in the forced labor facility of Perm Gulag, Russia. They intensified his work load until it killed him on September 4, 1985. The Communists was determined to rob Ukraine of it's prestige and subsequently forbad his body's return to Ukraine until after his full sentenced time was completed. On 19 November 1989 his body was returned from exile to Ukraine for burial, like the bard Shevchenko with a crown of thorns upon his coffin.

Julia Tymoshenko is great playing chameleon as Mother Ukraina, Cleopatra and the Alexandrian Library, Joan de arc, even Mary Queen of Scots. Donetsk' Bard Vasyl Stus may be an emulation best left undisturbed. By her, not Ukraine.

{# <-- parent id goes here
blueriver July 21, 2012, 11:19 p.m.    

Yes I agree Yulia and European values democracy

Its sad that the Party of Babies are so so scared afraid of Yulia they had to lock her up in Jail and they were so terrified they moved her to East Ukraine.

{# <-- parent id goes here
Dirk July 22, 2012, 7:22 a.m.    

blueriver-That pretty much sums it up. The same, dull, predictable Bolshevism that Russia has inflicted upon Ukraine for decades. Sad to see that Tymoshenko has become Sakharov again after 37 years. Same as it ever was under General-Secretary Putin via his puppet Yanukovych.

{# <-- parent id goes here
Byron Hill July 22, 2012, 8:57 p.m.    

Kind of makes you feel silly and uniformed doesn't it mr. dmytro. Now a word of advice, it is obvious that you did not earn an education, but that father paid bribes to teacher to give you a grand certificate. My advice, let your children learn, let them study, let them earn self respect and dignity. With an education they will be able to hold their heads high even with a shameful name as Vidrin.

{# <-- parent id goes here
IvanovPetrovSidorov July 23, 2012, 12:44 p.m.    

No frigging way! Have they run out of proper people to give it to or what? What kind of farce is this when a convicted oligarch is being considered for a Nobel?

{# <-- parent id goes here
carl July 23, 2012, 8:33 p.m.    

It is a farce,they gave one to obama while he was waging war.

{# <-- parent id goes here
carl July 23, 2012, 8:37 p.m.    

Nobel Peace Prize is a joke. It is given to criminals,terrorists like Mandela,Lutuli.

{# <-- parent id goes here
Roman Dawydiak July 24, 2012, 12:07 p.m.    

Putting aside the racist connotations of your remark, who would you have preferred? Perhaps Adolph Hitler and Joseph Stalin for their work in controlling European population growth? Grow up!

{# <-- parent id goes here
carl July 24, 2012, 6:17 p.m.    

You are the one seeing race. Hitler,Stalin were scum . Mandela,Lutuli supported,directed a terror campaign that killed many innocents both black an white. The mixed race obama has never been shy about killing nonwhites.

{# <-- parent id goes here

KyivPost

© 1995–2014 Public Media

Web links to Kyiv Post material are allowed provided that they contain a URL hyperlink to the www.kyivpost.com material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. Otherwise, all materials contained on this site are protected by copyright law and may not be reproduced without the prior written permission of Public Media at news@kyivpost.com
All information of the Interfax-Ukraine news agency placed on this web site is designed for internal use only. Its reproduction or distribution in any form is prohibited without a written permission of Interfax-Ukraine.