It's beta of the site. Let us know your opinion.
Weather       +5 °C
Currency:  1USD  7.38  1EUR 9.32
Search:  
 
 Sign In   Register
OP-ED

Disappointment keeps Soviet nostalgia alive

15 October, 22:36 | Yuriy Lukanov, Special to Kyiv Post
Disappointment keeps Soviet nostalgia alive
UNIAN
A man holds a Soviet flag near the
Lenin monument in Donetsk in late 2007.
City leaders refuse to obey a
presidential decree to remove the
statue.
Preserving Soviet-era monuments to the authors of the insatiable communist regime would be similar to keeping Hitler monuments in Germany.

Recently the city council in Donetsk, a mining city in eastern Ukraine, flatly refused to get rid of a multitude of totalitarian symbols and signs in the streets. The removal was decreed by President Victor Yushchenko, who meant to get rid of the statues of Lenin and other communist activists, as well as communist street names.

This move would be logical because it was Lenin and his party who started concentration camps and murders of political opponents, which later multiplied immensely in scale during successor Josef Stalin’s reign. Preserving monuments to the authors of the insatiable communist regime would be similar to keeping Hitler monuments in Germany.

Generally, Donetsk Mayor Oleksandr Lukianchenko spoke against street renaming for purely financial reasons. Apart from changing street signs, it requires changes in many official forms, as well as new registration stamps for their residents. The cost may go way over a few million hryvnias since the streets of Donetsk are full of communism.

There is a “50 Years of U.S.S.R.” street and a “60 Years of U.S.S.R.” street. Each Communist Party congress became a toponym and so did various communist leaders. There are some comical examples: there is a Lenin street and an Illich street named after the same person. Lenin was the Soviet leader's pseudonym, and Illich – his patronymic.

But other people in Donetsk have spiritual motives rather than financial. The inspiration for the movement to stop the removal of totalitarian symbols was a curious secretary of the city council, Mykola Levchenko, who drives a car with a personalized number plate that says “CCCP,” the U.S.S.R. acronym in Russian. He misses the U.S.S.R. greatly. He said: “Our city has historical names that some people link with totalitarianism. I link it to the fact that we were all born in that country.”

Not only does the Donetsk city council refuse to ruin Soviet symbols, it creates new ones: one of the new streets in the city was called “Novaya Sovetskaya,” or New Soviet street.

It’s a paradox, but Ukrainians, of whom 91 percent voted at a referendum in December 1991 to exit the U.S.S.R., now have strong nostalgic sentiments toward it. They are not dominating, but are very serious, even though 17 years ago people had an ironic attitude towards the communist empire.

Here are some examples. In the old Soviet times there was a lot of propagandist emphasis on Lenin’s participation in the worker’s "subotniks," or unpaid voluntary work on weekends. On Saturdays, the citizens came out to clean communal spaces for free or do similar things. History textbooks contained a story of Lenin carrying logs with common workers. In other words, there was a whole cult built around the leader of the proletariat called Lenin. In the last years of the U.S.S.R.'s existence, the citizens laughed at it. They said ironically that the longer Lenin participated in the tradition of subotniks, the greater became the number of people wanting to carry logs with him, or be close to power. They also joked that the log was inflatable rather than real.

Not all of them continue to laugh. Recently, I got talking to a lady about 40 years old. She lived a part of her life in the Soviet Union and knows too well what it was like.

One thing after another, we got to talking about the past. That’s when she surprised me. She reminisced that, in communist times, shops were full of pretty much everything we have now. She talked about how citizens could travel abroad as much as they wished, how fair the Soviet system of justice was, only punishing people if they deserved it.

These are obvious falsehoods. Soviet shops had one or two types of milk, bread and sausages, and only in the morning. If you came in the afternoon, all you could find was maybe jars of mayonnaise. There were queues for anything of quality, be it food or consumer goods. Simple mortal folks could not travel to the so-called capitalist countries. You had to be an athlete or a statesman to receive that privilege. Other citizens could only go touring the countries under Soviet control. But your wish was not enough to get you there. Potential tourists had to get recommendations from their workers’ collective, as well as a positive assessment from the party or Komsomol, the youth wing of the Communist Party organization. And prisons awaited not just criminals, but government critics, too.

The Soviet people lived badly. So, why does my friend and so many others like her twist the obvious facts?

When Ukrainians said farewell to communism in their country, they hoped to create a state that lived up to Western standards. But the dream has not come true. Although we have some fundamental basics of a democratic society – like freedom of speech – we have not yet learned to make good use of the opportunities that democracy has given us.

So far, we have built the kind of capitalism that was depicted by Soviet propaganda when it spoke of the West.

Yes, our shops are full, you can travel freely as long as other countries let you in, and you can criticize anyone, anytime. But the difference between the incomes of the rich and the poor are thousands-fold.Some people’s incomes are so low they can only buy a minimum of food. There is no justice in courts. So, psychologically, people need to feel that there is an alternative. They turn to their past, painting it rosy colors in their memory. In practice, it manifests itself in an aggressive defense of Soviet symbols.

However, not everyone defends them so. Sometimes, the media report that someone, somewhere has urinated on a monument of Lenin.

Yuriy Lukanov is a freelance journalist and writer in Kyiv.

  Comments (10)
Add your comment
Left 1000 symbols
.
Comments on page
Guest  (Guest) | 21.10.2008, 00:56
The obvious is inevitable.Ukraine will be split down the middle and its Eastern cities will return to Russia,a country that is quickly isolating itself from the rest of the World.The Western side will seek shelter in Europe and will get the protection they need.In 2004 many Ukrainians was under a dillusion they would wake up and find a new shiny Mercedes outside for them,not so

As for your article I will personally come to Donetsk and demolish every trace of Communism and sell the scrap back to Russia.You gave Yushenko a mandate to run the Country now support him in his time of need.We stressed out people in the West will support any attempt to give Fred and Edna a better quality of life ,totally furious about it all.!!!
.
Answer  
Valeriy S.  (Guest) | 17.10.2008, 17:26
Pls keep in mind: Kyiv - not Kiev, Ukraine - not the Ukraine. These are severe errors that offend national ukrainian feelings...
Answer  
Valeriy S.  (Guest) | 17.10.2008, 17:12
Yeah! I understand quite well when the soviet regime still lives in the hearts of elder people! They were young and healthy there. And the world was colorful for them. But I can\'t explain when it takes place in case of younger generation as well. To my mind, that is due to ilack of truth! Our young people in south-eastern zone of Ukraine are still being deceived by former communist nomenclatura liars! But times are changing! Down with communism and its iidols!
Answer  
Guest  (Guest) | 16.10.2008, 19:36
according to people that i spoke during my many visits to Ukraine esp to Kiev, i am surprised that the majority of the people favored the old Soviet system. What the people told you may not be falseafter all. Everyone wants to have their needs met such as providing for their family, a roof over their heads and enough money to buy what they need without going broke. they had during the Soviet Union. It was only towards the very end the system began to implode on itself. Additionaly i ve heard from many people around Ukriane stating that they did not want to leave the USSR for fear of change. It was a small group of Ukrainian opportunist that favored the independence of Ukraine. Ukraine is worse off now than at any point in its history. you have a President on the take from the West, esp the USA. He has not done anything positive except stir nationalistic fever which clouds the corruption and chaos going on the country.
Answer  
Guest in Ukraine  (Guest) | 21.10.2008, 18:12
To say that \"Ukraine is worse off now than at any point in its history\" is to be ignorant of Ukrainian history. How about the 2 Stalin-directed forced famines of the 30s where millions of innocent people died and food was more than scarce? How about WWII, when Ukraine was overrun by Nazis and again by the Red Army? How about during its long struggle for independence from greedy neighbors (Russia, Poland, Lithuania, Germany, Austria) who over-ran it time and time again, causing both political and economic hardships. To be honest, I think the economy now is still better than it has been for a long time. Yes, it needs to improve, especially in salaries, as prices are rising quickly while salaries are still low. But, to think that everything in Soviet times was great is to see thru propoganda-colored glasses. Yes, there were times of having enough, but variety was nil and freedom was nil. Anyone opposed to the system was sent to the gulags. Who said freedom was cheap? Freedom always costs!
Answer  
Odessa Mama - 2  (Guest) | 16.10.2008, 18:52
You think you have “nostalgia” for Communism now, wait until the real govno hits the fan. Time for Eastern Europe to learn where the neo-liberal prescriptions of Soros and Greenspan lead. Just ask Argentina and the rest of South America; and their problems developed during economically much more stable times. God forbid, but economically 2009 in Ukraine is likely to be closer to 1932 than 1998. One can only hope that the Ukrainian people will take the opportunity provided by the looming depression to chase the pimps out of the temple; but they will need to get rid of their pockmarked whore first.
Answer  
Odessa Mama  (Guest) | 16.10.2008, 18:47
So, this the Ukraine of unlimited free speech, where a president who has less popular support than Breznev on his worst day, is ordering citizens and municipalities to follow his unilateral decrees as to who they can honor? If Donetsk is saying it’s a matter of money, I am shore Soros and the CIA can funnel the necessary funds – with an appropriate transfer fee paid to Yushcnenko and “Our” Ukraine. It will be quite a bit harder to raise the funds needed to bail out a mismanaged economy owned by foreign creditors.
Answer  
Guest  (Guest) | 16.10.2008, 16:37
The reason for nostalgia is the damn corrupt politicians and oligarchs that Ukraine has that are stealing the money from the country how many billionaires does Ukraine have, once in you Kiev and you start seeing the controversy and the difference between the rich and poor, you begin to despise the country who allows its girls and men to become humiliated abroad searching for money and labeled as prostitutes and whores it is the indecency of the ukrainian men that don\'t have any morals when it comes to their community for them they are ready to trade with their honor and respect to gain extra dollars.
Answer  
GeoV  (Guest) | 16.10.2008, 12:53
Some of this sounds like deja vu - but from the former Yugoslavia rather than the former U.S.S.R. In Macedonia or Bosnia, for instance, you find a nostalgia for the days of Tito even among those who must barely be able to remember him. (And the flowers on Tito\'s statue in Bitola, Macedonia, look very fresh.) Sarajevo, much like Kyiv, has the appearance of a modern city. But, earlier this year, I heard the familiar refrain of how people used to be able to travel anywhere, how there was little crime because criminals were properly punished and so on. I remember travelling into Yugoslavia from Austia in 1983. It was exceptionally difficult to find anything worth buying with dinars and, such was the disparity between standards of living, one wonders where the money to fund all this travel came from. The reasons for the nostalgia? Failed expectations, lack of faith in politicians and the judicial system, corruption - and a system that does not yet live up to the Western illusion. Familiar?
Answer  
Kev Rymell  (Guest) | 22.10.2008, 13:44
Everyone looks back with \'rose coloured glasses\'. Personally, I do not mind the statues, I love the Lenin Statue in Yalta! You cannot forget the past, it existed you can\'t change it - you can alter the future. Yushchenko should concentrate on other things rather than lumps of stone and metal on the streets of Donesk.

Soviet times were not better, for a start you were not allowed to say what you thought for fear of what might happen. Today, you can say what you like, within reason! Life is not perfect in the Ukraine, but the potential for the future is far better than anything that was promised by the Soviets.
Answer  
Advertising

Most popular articles:

Tags: