It's beta of the site. Let us know your opinion.
Weather       +5 °C
Currency:  1USD  7.7  1EUR 10.49
Search:  
 
 Sign In   Register

Germany rebuffs U.S. on NATO ties for Ukraine,Georgia

2 December 2008, 14:35 | Reuters
Germany rebuffs U.S. on NATO ties for Ukraine,Georgia
BRUSSELS, Dec 2 (Reuters) - Germany insisted on Tuesday there were no grounds for NATO to deepen ties with Ukraine and Georgia for now, rejecting a U.S. bid aimed at advancing the two ex-Soviet states' membership prospects.

At a meeting of alliance foreign ministers, European capitals urged NATO to study resuming full contacts with Russia that were scaled down after Moscow's incursion into Georgia in August, but Washington is reluctant to make any early move.

President George W. Bush, who hands over to President-elect Barack Obama in January, had wanted as part of his legacy to set the ex-Soviet states on the established path to NATO, with formal roadmaps, or Membership Action Plans (MAPs).

But that policy enraged Moscow while France and Germany -- worried about the reaction of a key energy supplier and arguing that neither Kiev nor Tbilisi were ready for such a step -- blocked the move at an April NATO summit in Bucharest.

That summit gave Georgia and Ukraine vague promises of eventual NATO entry and agreed to review their MAP requests by year-end. But Georgia's August clash with Russia and Ukraine's political chaos have only added to European doubts.

"I hope we will agree to stick with the agreement from Bucharest. I see no reason to go beyond that for now," German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier told reporters as he arrived for the two-day meeting in Brussels.

U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice has backed a possible compromise of seeking to advance Ukrainian and Georgian entry hopes through the bilateral forums which NATO has already established with each country.

Berlin has accused the United States of trying to provide short-cuts to membership, something Washington denies. Germany backs using those forums to supervise annual reform programmes but insists MAPs are still needed eventually.

In a move that should be welcomed in Europe, Rice said she did not oppose "in principle" reviving contacts with Russia via a NATO-Russia Council (NRC) suspended after Russia's Georgia invasion, something Germany and other allies have sought.

But, referring to Russian troops still in the Georgia breakaway regions of South Ossetia and Abkhazia, she added:

"I think you'd want to be very careful, for instance, about doing things that look military-to-military, because the Russian military is still sitting in the secessionist states."

The European Union is due later on Tuesday to formally restart talks on a partnership accord with Russia that were frozen in the wake of the August conflict, and many European nations are pushing for NATO to ramp up ties with Moscow again.

"I think the time has come to resume negotiations (with Russia on cooperation)," said Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini, proposing a start with ambassadorial contacts and a full resumption at leader-level by a NATO summit next April.

A NATO diplomat said the NATO meeting could call for a review of relations with Russia for a NATO summit in April.

  Comments (3)
Add your comment
Left 1000 symbols
.
Guest  (Guest) | 02.12.2008, 16:43
Forget it, Roman. As an EU citizen, I would demand that Ukraine not even be allowed near the EU or NATO, until she has understaken the desperately needed reforms she\'s got to do. I simply don\'t understand the logic of Euroatlaticist Ukrainians: \"Let us in - then we\'ll reform and not be a laughing stock! Really, we promise.\"

It may be comforting to blame the whole thing on Germany and France, but wake up!
Do you not see that the never-ended political soap opera in the Rada and between your President and PM is the worst possible advertisement Ukraine could possibly offer? And what is Europe supposed to do? Trust Ukraine? You don\'t even trust each other!

Screw it. Get your house in order, then come knocking on our door.
Answer  
Guest  (Guest) | 02.12.2008, 15:47
The foreign policies of France and Germany under their current leadership (and let\'s face it they are even worse than Bush) have been completely void seriousness. But on their position in NATO regarding Ukraine and Georgia, they finally got it right. Ukraine does not belong in NATO (I don\'t know enough about Georgia). But Ukraine is outrageously corrupt and undemocratic, unruly and undeveloped. The ruling \"elites\" -- more like dirty gangsters from the villiage - have politicized NATO far too much and too long in order to cover up their own weaknesses and incompetency. NATO should go even further and publicly explain why Ukraine cannot be accepted to NATO. A rejection of Ukraine sends the right signal to regular Ukrainians: Your government is garbage, and it\'s your responsibility to clean it up!

Ukraine wants to be a buffer state, playing off East and West for favors, but Ukraine should be prepared then to be played as a bargaining chip by the East and West!
Answer  
Roman  (Guest) | 02.12.2008, 15:21
IThis is a repeat of the Hitler-Stalin pact in the early days of WWII. Ukraine is being sacrificed so that Germany can keep warm on Russian oil. There is a good reason that I sold my BMW years ago and have purchased four Toyota\'s ever since. I will not support Germany with my paycheck with short-sighted attitudes like they are showing. If someone wants to join NATO, let them. We should replace Germany and France with Ukraine and Georgia. France and Germany enjoy a buffer with the addition of a few Eastern countries and that\'s why they are big fat weak sheep licking the on the boots of the Kremlin. Baaaaaah-baaah.
Answer  
Advertising

MOST POPULAR ARTICLES: