The unprecedented joint US – Israeli strike on Iran has altered the strategic calculus in the Middle East. For years, European leaders treated the Islamic Republic as a chronic but manageable problem – a destabilizing force to be contained through diplomacy, sanctions, and periodic brinkmanship. That assumption no longer holds. The strike has exposed the regime’s fragility and created an opening that Europe should not squander.
Intelligence assessments circulating in Western capitals suggest that the pillars of the Iranian regime are under severe strain. Economic collapse, factional infighting, and popular unrest have converged in ways not seen in decades. The mass protests that erupted in January – and the brutal crackdown that followed – shattered any remaining illusion of domestic legitimacy. Tens of thousands of demonstrators were reportedly killed or detained. The memory of that repression remains raw, and opposition networks inside and outside the country view the current moment as pivotal.
For Europe, this is not simply a matter of solidarity with an oppressed people. It is a question of security.
Over nearly five decades, the Islamic Republic has positioned itself as an adversary of the West. Its support for proxy militias across the Middle East – from Hezbollah in Lebanon to the Houthis in Yemen – has fueled instability along critical trade corridors. Its actions in the Strait of Hormuz have threatened energy supplies and maritime security. European citizens have been detained and used as bargaining chips. Intelligence services across the continent have linked Tehran to assassination plots and surveillance operations on European soil.
More recently, Iran’s provision of weapons to Russia for use in Ukraine has placed it squarely in confrontation with Europe’s core strategic interests. Drones and missiles supplied by Tehran have been deployed against Ukrainian cities, contributing to civilian casualties and the destruction of infrastructure. In effect, the Islamic Republic has aligned itself with a war effort that directly challenges European security.
Boots on the ground?
This does not necessarily mean boots on the ground or unilateral escalation. It means recognizing that the status quo is untenable. After forty years of attempted accommodation, the regime has not moderated. Instead, it has entrenched repression at home and confrontation abroad.
There is also a moral dimension that resonates beyond geopolitics. The January massacre, the imprisonment of dissidents, and the systemic discrimination against women and minorities – these are not abstract issues. They are daily realities for millions of Iranians. If Europe defines itself as a community grounded in human rights and democratic values, its Iran policy cannot be divorced from those principles.
The emerging consensus among advocates of a firmer line is that Europe should support a transition to democratic elections and recognize a united, representative opposition as the legitimate voice of the Iranian people. Such recognition would send a powerful signal – both to the regime and to those risking their lives on the streets of Tehran, Isfahan, and Mashhad.
None of this guarantees a smooth or swift transformation. Authoritarian systems rarely relinquish power without resistance. But moments of strategic flux are rare. The recent strike has created one.
Europe must now decide whether to retreat to the familiar language of de-escalation and dialogue, or to acknowledge that a fundamental shift is underway.
For those who see the Islamic Republic as a persistent and escalating threat to European security, economy and values, the choice is clear: support the Iranian people in their struggle for liberation and prepare for a post-regime order.
In other words, it’s time for Europe to stop watching and start acting.
See the original of this analysis for Euractiv by Matthew Karnitschnig here.