The Kyiv Post welcomes feedback about our new website and we stand ready to fix any problems users might encounter in our test phase. Contact us at: news@kyivpost.com or +38-044-591-3344. Thank you!

Share Tweet Pocket Add to Bookmarks
You're reading: Libya claims on NATO strikes can be absurd

TRIPOLI, Libya (AP) — The small note in curly handwriting was quietly passed by a medic to a foreign reporter in a Tripoli hospital.

Its hastily scrawled contents suggested that Libyan officials were lying when they said a baby girl was wounded in a NATO attack.

Government officials had bused reporters to the Tripoli Central Hospital to see the baby, whom they identified as Haneen.

She lay on a stark hospital cot, with colorful tubes attached to her body. Her foot was bandaged.

"This is a case of road traffic accident," the medic’s note read.

"This is the trouth," said the last line, the word misspelled.

That small scrap of paper underlines the absurdity confronting reporters who try to cover Moammar Gadhafi’s regime in Tripoli, the Libyan capital.

It appears that officials exaggerate the scope of and casualties from two months of NATO airstrikes that have targeted sites critical to Gadhafi.

Regime officials try to prove that alliance strikes, instead of protecting Libyan civilians, is doing them harm.

Those thundering NATO strikes do sometimes kill and wound civilians.

They do cause damage to homes, hospitals and roads.

But some government officials appear determined, understandably, to exagerate the damage done and casualties caused.

Government officials said the baby girl was injured in a NATO strike on a target near her house on the outskirts of Tripoli early Sunday.

A Libyan official identified one man who spoke to reporters as the child’s neighbor.

As he spoke to reporters, the Libyan official nudged him to condemn NATO.

A woman who was identified as her mother was led by a Libyan official to stand beside the baby. Photographers snapped photos.

And then a medic quitely dropped the note. A reporter covered it with his foot and read it only later, when government officials weren’t looking.

Reporters in Tripoli have agreed not to photograph the note, identify the medic’s specific job or the medic’s gender.

They fear the care-giver would face harsh retribution if identified.

The note is in the possession of a foreign reporter who is allowing other journalists to see it.

It was scrawled in blue ink on the back of a doctor’s diagnosis form.

The medic disappeared into a crowd of hospital staff before reporters could ask questions.

Hours later, reporters were shipped to another site where officials said a NATO strike targeted a farm house on Tripoli’s outskirts.

An unexploded, rusting bomb lay between the palms and olive trees on the farm.

"The women ran away screaming and the children lay on the floor," said the farm owner Mohammed al-Najeh. The 50-year-old said he and his family were sitting in the garden when the bomb landed on Sunday evening.

The farmer’s young son nodded solemnly, clutching a large green flag — the color of the Libyan regime.

But what appeared to be Cyrillic script used by the Russians could be seen on the back of the barrel-shaped explosive.

Russia, of course, is not part of NATO. But it has been an arms supplier to Libya in the past.

When questioned about the Russian script, reporters were offered a different story.

"The NATO strike hit a missile depot about a kilometer (about half a mile) away," said one man.

"The missiles flew in the air, and one of them landed here," the man said.

It was the same man who was initially identified as the baby girl’s neighbor earlier in the day.

When pressed by reporters, he identified himself as a government official called Emad Ghaith.

Libya’s deputy foreign minister said it was not government policy to make up stories for the foreign press.

"The government message is credible. I am sure if there is a mistake, its not from government sources," said Khaled Kaim at a press briefing at a bombed-out building on Monday.

He said Libyan residents wanting to emphasize how they are suffering under NATO attacks might be be exaggerating.

"It is from people who are enthusiastic, and they want to show journalists that there is injustice and targeting of civilians," he said.

Found a spelling error? Let us know – highlight it and press Ctrl + Enter.

Advertisement

Add comment

Sorry, you must be logged in to post a comment.
More in this section
Attention

Add a picture
Choose file
Add a quote
Attention

Are you sure you want to delete your comment?

Attention

Are you sure you want to delete all user's comments?

Attention

Are you sure you want to unapprove user's comment?

Attention

Are you sure you want to move to spam user's comment?

Attention

Are you sure you want to move to trash user's comment?

Spelling error report

The following text will be sent to our editors: