Share Tweet Pocket Add to Bookmarks
You're reading: Stopping Nord Stream 2

Encouraging developments took place this week in Ukraine’s quest to get European nations to back out of a partnership with Russia to build the Nord Stream 2 pipeline. The $10 billion pipeline would transport up to 55 billion cubic meters of gas under the Baltic Sea, from Russia to Germany, and bypass Ukraine’s gas transportation network. Nord Stream 2 could be completed by the end of 2019.

Morally, it’s wrong to be helping Russia’s economy while hurting Ukraine’s simultaneously. But Europe also needs economic reasons to ditch the project. This is where U.S. help in supplying liquified natural gas and encouragement of other, renewable energy sources will help.

It was heartening to read the comments of Roderich Kiesewetter, the point person for German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s bloc in parliament’s foreign affairs committee on July 27. As reported by Bloomberg, Kiesewetter said Nord Stream 2 “mustn’t come at the expense of Ukraine or Eastern Europe” and welcomed the U.S. Congress adoption of sanctions on Russia to rein in U.S. President Donald J. Trump. “The cause of the sanctions is the unlawful occupation of Crimea, is the destabilization of Eastern Ukraine,” Kiesewetter is quoted as telling Deutschlandfunk public radio. Amen.

Exclusive article

Sign up or subscribe to view more articles.
See All Plans
Monthly plan
Get unlimited article access, anytime, anywhere.

Yearly plan
Access all the exclusive content on and the complete online archive.

Add comment

Sorry, you must be logged in to post a comment.

Add a picture
Choose file
Add a quote

Are you sure you want to delete your comment?


Are you sure you want to delete all user's comments?


Are you sure you want to unapprove user's comment?


Are you sure you want to move to spam user's comment?


Are you sure you want to move to trash user's comment?