Share Tweet Pocket Add to Bookmarks
You're reading: Yanukovych 2004 and 2010

He had been prime minister under Kuchma during the two years preceding the election. A President Yanukovych taking office in 2005 would no doubt have perpetuated the policies of the Kuchma regime, and left most of its personnel in place.

The elites that dominated Ukrainian politics were too powerful, too entrenched and political forces that might have pushed a Yanukovych presidency towards democratic reform were weak and undeveloped in 2005.

Yanukovych came to the presidency in 2010 a much more independent and experienced politician, with a much clearer sense for what needed to be done. And he governs a people who are harder to manipulate and less fearful of standing up to state power.

Exclusive article

Sign up or subscribe to view more articles.
See All Plans
$5.95
Monthly plan
Get unlimited article access, anytime, anywhere.

Subscribe
$60
Yearly plan
Access all the exclusive content on KyivPost.com and the complete online archive.
Subscribe
Advertisement

Add comment

Sorry, you must be logged in to post a comment.
Attention

Add a picture
Choose file
Add a quote
Attention

Are you sure you want to delete your comment?

Attention

Are you sure you want to delete all user's comments?

Attention

Are you sure you want to unapprove user's comment?

Attention

Are you sure you want to move to spam user's comment?

Attention

Are you sure you want to move to trash user's comment?

Spelling error report

The following text will be sent to our editors: