Russian language debate splits Ukraine

Print version
July 12, 2012, 3:38 p.m. | Ukraine — by Reuters

Many Ukrainians advocate the "one nation - one language" principle, a fact that analysts say means the bill might backfire.


DONETSK/LVIV - Were it not for Ukrainian-language signs on post offices and other state institutions, one could easily mistake Donetsk, the industrial centre of eastern Ukraine and the power base of the ruling Party of the Regions, for a Russian city.

The language of Ukraine's former Soviet overlord dominates the city of 1 million - nearly half of them ethnic Russians - where a statue of Communist leader Vladimir Lenin still graces the main square two decades after the Soviet Union collapsed.

Famous for its coal mines, steel smelters and bloody gang wars of the 1990s, the home city of President Viktor Yanukovich has welcomed a move by his Regions party to restore Russian as the language for official business in Ukraine's east and south.

"Canada has two state languages, Switzerland has four, I think this is the right approach," said Volodymyr, a retired mining communications engineer who complained that translating technical documents into Ukrainian was a waste of time.

The language bill is widely seen as a bid by the party to revive ratings hit by public disgruntlement with economic hardship in time for a parliamentary election in October.

But whereas moves to promote regional languages elsewhere in Europe have caused little political pain,Ukraine's bill has touched such a raw nerve that it is now in limbo after fists flew in parliament and protesters clashed with police.

The fierce debate it has stirred over Russian influence was likely to cloud a visit by Russian President Vladimir Putin on Thursday to discuss the price Kyiv should pay for Russian gas.

It is also another complication for one of Yanukovich's top foreign policy goals, integration with Europe's mainstream.

The European Union is not even discussing membership yet and shelved an agreement offering closer ties after former prime minister Yulia Tymoshenko was jailed for abuse of power last October, a sentence seen byBrussels as an example of selective justice.

Many Russian speakers believe the new law protects against encroachment by "western nationalists" such as the introduction of mandatory Ukrainian dubbing of films by the government of previous president Viktor Yushchenko.

For its opponents it is a blow to the fragile sovereignty of a country long divided between regional powers and persecuted by Moscow's tsars and its Communist leaders. Some say it could end up splitting the country in two.

It triggered uproar in the western city of Lviv, a cultural opposite of Donetsk featuring medieval European architecture and a statue of Stepan Bandera, a World War Two nationalist leader who temporarily sided with the Nazi Germans against Soviet rule.

Historically a Polish city with a large ethnic Ukrainian population in adjacent rural areas, Lviv was annexed by the Soviet Union in 1939. Many of its residents - who almost all speak Ukrainian - equate Soviet rule with Russian occupation.

Opponents of the bill set up a tent camp in the city centre, blocked all entrances of the local government building and burned a Party of the Regions flag in protest.

"This bill aims to undermine the status of the state language," says Maria Zubrytska, a deputy rector at the Ivan Franko National University of Lviv.

"It is, above all, a threat to the authority of the constitution ... a new form of neo-colonialism."


Ukrainian, an allied Slav language considered a mere dialect of Russian by the rulers of the Russian Empire - a view still held by some Russians - was barred from schools and printing presses in the 19th century.

The 1917 Bolshevik revolution brought only a temporary relief as new Soviet leaders soon began enforcing the use of Russian as a universal language across the USSR.

While the use of Ukrainian was not barred, Russian-language schools were more prestigious and offered better prospects for further education.

"As a first-grader, I once asked for a fairy-tale book in Ukrainian at the school library," says Natalia, an office worker in Kiev who grew up in the Soviet Union.

"The librarian refused, saying: 'You only start studying Ukrainian in the second grade'."

Soviet industrialisation campaigns of the 20s, 30s and post-war years brought an influx of millions of Russians who mostly settled in Ukraine's eastern regions rich with coal and iron ore deposits and were under no pressure to learn the local language.

The Crimean peninsula, given to Ukraine by Russia in 1954 by Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev but the base for Russia's Black Sea fleet at Sevastopol, is another Russian-speaking stronghold.

According to a 2001 census, there were 8.3 million Russians in Ukraine but Prime Minister Mykola Azarov, an ethnic Russian himself who speaks Ukrainian only with difficulty, raised eyebrows last month when he said there were 20 million ethnic Russians in the nation of 46 million.

People in Donetsk, as well as other eastern and southern cities, already use Ukrainian quite rarely - mostly when dealing with government paperwork and going to cinemas.

Even court hearings, which by law must be held in Ukrainian, are often conducted in Russian and only translated into Ukrainian for records, locals say.

Donetsk bookseller Tetyana, 23, says books in Ukrainian occupy only 10 percent of her shelves at best. "There simply is not enough demand," she explains.

"The Ukrainian language just does not exist any more," chimes in her colleague from a nearby store who refuses to introduce herself. "All that is left is Surzhik (a Russian-Ukrainian pidgin)."

But many Ukrainians advocate the "one nation - one language" principle, a fact that analysts say means the bill might backfire. According to the Razumkov centre, a local pollster and think tank, the population is roughly evenly split on the issue.

In particular, 43.6 percent think that only Ukrainian should be state language, 25 percent support the idea of giving Russian official status in certain regions and 23.9 percent think it should be the second state language.

"Many people in the Party of the Regions are themselves questioning (the need for the language bill) because they understand that they have given their opponents a great way of mobilising (public support) against them," says Donetsk-based political analyst Volodymyr Kipen.

Iryna Chernichenko, a bilingual journalism teacher in Donetsk said it was a political game.

"I think a myth is being spread by certain politicians... about the oppression of the Russian language and it has been accepted as truth by some people," she said. "The adoption of this bill by parliament is splitting the country."

The bill is now in limbo after parliament speaker Volodymyr Lytvyn, a member of the ruling coalition, refused to sign it and threatened to resign. The chamber then went into recess until September.

Yanukovich, a Russian speaker who speaks Ukrainian at state and official functions and has back-pedalled on a 2009 pledge to upgrade Russian, has not said whether he will sign the bill into law if it lands on his table.

A think tank employed by his office, the National Institute of Strategic Research, advised against any language reforms over a year ago.

About a quarter of Ukrainians living in the eastern and southern regions believe the East-West schism over language and politics could eventually break up the country, it said.

"This picture demonstrates an extreme weakness, if not absence, of a common social and cultural foundation of the Ukrainian political nation and the presence of separatist and irredentist trends," it said.

"...Official recognition of non-state languages in certain regions will only complicate the situation and diminish the state's efforts at unification." 

The Kyiv Post is hosting comments to foster lively debate. Criticism is fine, but stick to the issues. Comments that include profanity or personal attacks will be removed from the site. If you think that a posted comment violates these standards, please flag it and alert us. We will take steps to block violators.
Roman Dawydiak July 12, 2012, 5:31 p.m.    

The vast majority of people that support this language bill are either Russians, little russians and individuals who have been duped by the Party of Reprobates. It is in essence divisive and harmful to the entire concept of an independent Ukraine.

{# <-- parent id goes here
Roman Dawydiak July 12, 2012, 5:38 p.m.    

P.S. Communists and sovoks should also be lumped into the column of reprobates.

{# <-- parent id goes here
Boico July 12, 2012, 10:32 p.m.    

Today English is a language of choice and business, why spend tremendous amount of money every year just to please some margin of people who hate language, history and the country they live in and never think about average Ukrainians other minorities. Maybe Party of Region has a plan to accommodate other people language needs (they all deserves that and have the right to be treated equally) as well and know how to finance that; maybe from own budget! Or maybe only Russian deserves that privilege?
I live in bilingual country but both of those languages are since the origins of its existence and one is English. I respect both of them and in my daily business I use languages of the country I was privilege to live in, and at the same time nobody stop me to cultivate my own language or culture what I do on my own time and money - that is real democracy. I wish Russian speaking minorities for once will look at the big pictures and stop thinking about themselves as a center of the world because for now they far away from norm of democracy and respect to others.

{# <-- parent id goes here
kpxoxol July 13, 2012, 6:43 a.m.    

English is distant FOURTH in popularity.

If Ucraine mind its future, the second official language after Russian in Ukraine should be MANDARIN - the most popular language in the World, heh, heh, heh :D

{# <-- parent id goes here
Jerry Vilna-Ukraina July 13, 2012, 4:51 a.m.    

Ukrainian is the language of Ukraine and its people and always has been and will be. Just like Russian is the language of Russia and its people. In Canada yes we have to languages but that is because both the French and English established the country and therefore this bilingualism is necessary. Ukraine, however, is a different story, Imperial Russia occupied Ukraine and forced Russian upon the native people,therefore now that Ukraine is independent, Ukrainian should be the language of the state. Russia is not a founder of our country, they occupied it, murdered our citizens, oppressed our culture and language, in other words they were an imperial entity. You cannot continue the past practices into todays world, the Ukrainian language is to be supreme in the country of Ukraine. Forcing official status of the language of our former oppressor is like making Israel into a bilingual state with German and Hebrew. This would just not work.

{# <-- parent id goes here
kpxoxol July 13, 2012, 6:40 a.m.    

"Split" is along the lines 20% orange LOSERS who make funny noises and commit crimes on the streets and 80% OVERWHELMING MAJORITY who have a good laugh on the orange morons, heh, heh, heh :D

"Director of the Kyiv-based Center for Political and Conflict Studies Mykhailo Pohrebynsky said at a press conference on Friday that about 20% of Ukrainians support the position of "ousting the Russian language from official use" in Ukraine.

"All that the opposition is currently doing is defending the position of a minority of Ukrainian citizens, while a majority calls for raising the status of the Russian language. All this hysteria, hunger strikes and so forth are the result of this, and I think this is an example of totalitarian thinking," the analyst said."

{# <-- parent id goes here


© 1995–2014 Public Media

Web links to Kyiv Post material are allowed provided that they contain a URL hyperlink to the material and a maximum 500-character extract of the story. Otherwise, all materials contained on this site are protected by copyright law and may not be reproduced without the prior written permission of Public Media at
All information of the Interfax-Ukraine news agency placed on this web site is designed for internal use only. Its reproduction or distribution in any form is prohibited without a written permission of Interfax-Ukraine.