The Russian missile strike on the funeral of a Ukrainian soldier that killed 51 people in the village of Hroza on Thursday could be a possible war crime, the UN has said.
British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said the strike “demonstrated the depths of depravity Russian forces are willing to sink to,” according to a spokesperson.
Mourners had gathered at a café in the village, located around 30 kilometers (18 miles) from the frontline town of Kupiansk, in the Kharkiv region when the attack occurred.
Denise Brown, the UN’s humanitarian coordinator for Ukraine, called the attack “absolutely horrifying,” stressing that “intentionally directing an attack against civilians or civilian objects is a war crime.”
AFP journalists at the scene of the aftermath saw blackened and dismembered bodies spread out on the ground opposite the ruins of the cafe.
Police and soldiers loaded white body bags of unidentifiable bodies onto trucks that would take them to Kharkiv, where forensic experts would carry out DNA searches.
I will not last long alone
“My son was just found without a head, without arms, without legs, without anything. They recognized him from his documents," Volodymyr Mukhovaty, 70, told AFP.
His wife and daughter-in-law were also attending the wake and although he had “little hope” of finding them alive, he watched rescue workers from a distance, just in case.
“I lived with my wife for 48 years,” he said. “I will not last long alone.”
Update on Russia’s ‘Massive’ Overnight Electric Grid Attack
A six-year-old child was also among the victims, said Interior Minister Igor Klymenko, who added that a total of 60 people had been attending the memorial service.
Klymenko said initial evidence showed an Iskander missile had been used.
The village only had a population of some 330 people.
The soldier, whose wake it was, had been killed a month after Russia invaded.
He had been buried in the southern city of Dnipro – away from his home village, then under Russian occupation.
He was reburied in Groza on Thursday morning. His wife and son, also a soldier, were both killed in the strike, a spokesman for the regional prosecutor's office was quoted as saying by the Interfax-Ukraine news agency.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who was attending a European summit in Spain, said he had no doubts that the strike had been deliberate.
“The Russian military could not fail to know where they were hitting,” he said. “It was not a blind strike.”
Zelensky also said he had secured agreements from several countries to provide Kyiv with more air defence systems and artillery.
“We will have more air defence – there are clear agreements,” he said.
“This is very important before winter. Spain, Italy, France, Germany, Great Britain -- thank you!”
German Chancellor Olaf Scholz had announced that Berlin would supply Kyiv with a new Patriot air-defence system.
Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock later posted on X, formerly Twitter: “As long as bombs hail on supermarkets and cafes, we do everything for #Ukraine to protect itself from Putin's missile terror.”
You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter
Comments (3)
It occurred to me yesterday that in 1991 the U.S., along with U.K., France, Saudi Arabia, and Egypt launched 'Desert Storm I' against Iraq when Iraq invaded Kuwait. The reasoning was essentially because Iraq illegally invaded and occupied Kuwait, but speculation was rampant that Kuwait's vast oil reserves played a role in the response. Most analysis at least mention Kuwait's 'vast oil reserves', and Saddam Hussein was a brutal out-of-control dictator. To my knowledge the essential 'official' reasoning was that Iraq illegally invaded Kuwait without provocation.
What are Ukrainians' thoughts today? What about the other most vulnerable countries, Poland, Latvia, Lithuania, and Estonia? As an American, I would absolutely support direct U.S. intervention. I don't believe such action would necessarily invoke NATO's article 5, but I think there could be a remarkably strong coalition of many states willing to respond to Russian aggression. Why must we all 'abandon' Ukraine?
We fear WW III, right? What would a broad coalition of the world's states against Russia look like? Right now it could be a 3-day war. We might call it WW III, but if it's the rapid defeat of one nation by the largest coalition in world history, and for damned good reason, what of it?
Downside? It could reinforce a standard that an illegal, unprovoked invasion by one aggressor country against another sovereign state would justify world intervention. Would that be a downside?
What of China?
What does Russia hope to achieve with this sort of attack ? Nothing of military value in that tiny hamlet. All it will do is strengthen the resolve of Ukrainian people to resist the murdering thugs. I honestly wonder which century Russia thinks it lives in, this is the sort of barbaric behaviour that Genghis Khan would have understood.
Maybe Russia has not moved on from that period of history ? If this doesn't make certain Western nations move to help and assist Ukraine now nothing will. I just shake my head over Germany's reluctance to send their long range missiles to help finish this war. Maybe America will also take the plunge ?
It's hard to see how Russia, surely the most uncultured country in the modern world, could have achieved this pointless war crime without some sort of humint to tell them the funeral was occurring.
Ukraine is fighting a secretive but important war against spies and traitors, as well as the fighting war.
@Charlie White, totally agree, some traitor informed the RuZZians about the event to cause a pointless carnage...