According to a report in the daily update from the Institute for the Study of War on Feb. 25, based on an article published the previous day in the Wall Street Journal:  

“UK, French, and German officials are reportedly preparing a NATO-Ukraine pact that falls far short of the protections Ukraine would receive from NATO membership and appears to reflect a desire to press Ukraine to accept a negotiated settlement on unfavorable terms.

The WSJ reported that the exact provisions of the pact are undecided, but the officials indicated that the pact will provide advanced military equipment, arms, and ammunition to Ukraine, but not Article V protection or a commitment to station NATO forces in Ukraine—falling short of Ukraine’s aspirations for full NATO membership. The officials stated that the pact aims to provision Ukraine so that Ukrainian forces can conduct a counteroffensive that brings Russia to the negotiating table and deter any future Russian aggression.

The WSJ noted that these officials expressed reservations about the West’s ability to sustain a prolonged war effort, the high casualty count that Ukraine would sustain in such a prolonged war, and Ukrainian forces’ ability to completely recapture long-occupied territories like Crimea, however.

The WSJ contrasted these officials’ private reservations with US President Joe Biden’s public statements of support—which did not mention peace negotiations—and with Central and Eastern European leaders’ concerns that premature peace negotiations would encourage further Russian aggression.

Russian President Vladimir Putin has given no indication that he is willing to compromise on his stated maximalist goals, which include Ukraine’s “neutrality” and demilitarization—as well as de facto regime change in Kyiv, as ISW has consistently reported.”


Authors: Riley Bailey, Grace Mappes, Kateryna Stepanenko, Nicole Wolkov, and Frederick W. Kagan.

See full report here.

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here
You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Comments (4)
BG Davis
This comment contains spoilers. Click here if you want to read.

More promises and continued failure to arm Ukraine properly. This is almost as bad as Czechoslovakia in 1968: the West encourages and promises, then fails to provide needed support.
Mike Richard
This comment contains spoilers. Click here if you want to read.

Putin revealed his criminal mindset with his latest speeches. Peace with him is impossible because he sees his Ukrainian invasion as a "turf war" with a rival "gang" that he calls the West, or NATO. He says they are seeking world domination. More than 140 countries who are UN members instead see the war as a "police" action to uphold the UN Charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It is impossible to negotiate concessions with a criminal organization. They can only be arrested, prosecuted and punished.
Jack Griffin
This comment contains spoilers. Click here if you want to read.

Fools! Outright fools! Evil is a cancer that can only be cured by destroying it. If you do not destroy evil it will raise its Hydra head again. The only "negotiation" should be a full and unconditional surrender and full withdrawal of all Russian troops from sovereign Ukrainian soil, including The Crimea. Anything less is unacceptable! And our illegitimate, incompetent, brain dead President BRIBEn should be giving The Ukraine all the weaponry necessary, including jets to accomplish such a surrender by the end of next summer, if not sooner.
jacques willemen
This comment contains spoilers. Click here if you want to read.

again, Ukriane is left allone and abonded by the West
38 meetings of backstabbing by china and russia and a limitless pact
russia and china choose over the backs of Ukraine to tackle the West
communist china, who fought a revolution for the liberation of the people from aristocracy and thiefs, and thugs now supports the kleptocratic maffia criminals in the maffia kriminalin in moscow
the china 12 points paper is to wipe your ass with