The EU bloc’s leadership duo, Ursula von der Leyen and António Costa, arrived empty-handed in Kyiv trailed by three mute commissioners. No fresh sanctions package and no €90 billion loan ready to deploy

Back in Brussels, the president of the European Parliament Roberta Metsola confused enthusiastic supporters of Ukraine by signing the loan into law – but with Hungary continuing to block the measure, the move is largely symbolic as the money cannot be raised or transferred.

Promising to get Ukraine into the bloc, as von der Leyen and other leaders did in the wake of Russia’s invasion, was always a long-term gamble. It’s now rearing its head in the shape of mounting Ukrainian frustration that, for all its appeasement, the EU cannot get a grip on Hungary’s wanton veto.

Advertisement

An awkward disagreement between von der Leyen and Volodymyr Zelensky live on stage exposed the limits of the EU’s high expectation setting.

Zelensky pressed for a commitment that Ukraine could join the EU by 2027 – an extremely short timeline for an accession process that normally lasts years and, for some candidates, has dragged on for decades or stalled indefinitely.

Addressing him directly, von der Leyen ruled out fixed deadlines. “The date you set is your benchmark that you want to match,” she said. “From our side, dates by themselves are not possible.”

Hungary’s Veto on Ukraine Remains, Just Moved Down the Road
Other Topics of Interest

Hungary’s Veto on Ukraine Remains, Just Moved Down the Road

Hungary and Ukraine have reached a comprehensive agreement restoring linguistic, educational, and cultural rights to roughly 100,000 ethnic Hungarians in the Zakarpattia region. Hungarian Prime Minister Péter Magyar announced that Budapest will conditionally support opening Ukraine’s first EU negotiating cluster once these measures are codified into Ukrainian law. While this milestone unblocks a two-year political stalemate and pocketed €16.4 billion in un-frozen EU funds for Budapest, it defers rather than eliminates Hungary’s veto power.

It was a clear rejection of Zelensky’s demand for a specific date, let alone one as ambitious as 2027. In part, von der Leyen’s hands are tied by governments. Several EU ministers made it clear on Tuesday they are squeamish about letting Ukraine cut corners in its accession bid. Corruption and judicial independence are still big worries.

Zelensky framed a firm entry date as the only way to ensure Putin doesn’t block EU accession for decades. But the domestic political calculus may be more immediate. If a ceasefire or peace deal were to materialize, he would need a tangible political gain to offset painful concessions, including perhaps territorial ones.

Advertisement

There is some talk in Brussels of a fast-tracked or partial accession.

“I think we should be imaginative,” Commissioner Hadja Lahbib told Nicoletta and me. Valdis Dombrovskis said last night the EU is exploring “non-standard” tactics to speed up the process. Marta Kos, though, has explicitly rejected the idea of a two-tier membership model, warning it would risk creating “second-class” EU citizens.

In a sobering assessment of the war’s trajectory, former Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba last night described the belief that Kyiv could win back all its territory as “euphoria that we got trapped in.”

Could the same one day be said for the hype about a speedy Ukraine accession to the EU?

This is report by Eddy Wax and Nicoletta is reprinted from Euractiv’s Rapporteur Newsletter.  See the original here.

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here
You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter