Russia has now lost 100 helicopters since its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, including 10 over the course of Kyiv’s summer offensive, according to data collected by an independent intelligence and monitoring organization.

In its most recent website update, Oryx reports that the Russian military has now had 100 helicopters neutralized since February 2022 including 87 destroyed, 12 damaged and one captured by Ukrainian forces.

could be interesting for you:

Ten Russian helicopters have been downed since the beginning of June when Ukraine ramped up counteroffensive activity on several sections of the 1,000-kilometer-long front.

Among Russia’s losses are 38 Ka-52 Kamaz “Alligator” helicopters which are considered by some military experts as “one of the best attack helicopters in the world.” This represents a loss approaching 40 percent of all Ka-52s that Russia allocated to its war on Ukraine.

Advertisement

The loss of 100 helicopters is significant due to the increased importance of air power at this phase of the war. Namely, as Ukrainian forces attempt to advance on the ground into occupied eastern and southern Ukraine, the Kremlin is seeking to use what remains of its superior air power as a critical advantage in its defensive strategy.

This includes increased helicopter attacks against oncoming Ukrainian infantry fighting vehicles, including those provided by Western allies, and troop concentrations, as well as the ability to rapidly bring up reserve troops and supplies from rear echelon positions in occupied southern Ukraine in particular.

Two Years into Russia-Ukraine War, Negotiations a Distant Prospect
Other Topics of Interest

Two Years into Russia-Ukraine War, Negotiations a Distant Prospect

2024 will be another year of war because Ukraine is determined to keep on fighting to recapture territory, while Putin will only be satisfied with Kyiv's full surrender, analysts and diplomats say.

Recent satellite imagery of an airfield in occupied Berdyansk showed the presence of 20 recently transferred Russian helicopters, including five Ka-52s, as well as construction to expand the facility.

At least some of Ukraine’s counteroffensive equipment losses are believed to have been inflicted by Ka-52s hovering over the battlefield and firing rockets, according to Forbes.

“Such aircraft are relatively unencumbered by harassing Ukrainian aircraft and mobile short-range air defense systems – known as SHORAD – both relative weaknesses that Kyiv has repeatedly urged the West to help strengthen over 16 months of full-scale war,” Forbes wrote.

Advertisement

At present, Ukraine has received commitments from the US, UK and European allies to potentially start F-16 jet training of Ukrainian pilots in August.

Kyiv Post analysis shows that Russia averages some 5 to 10 times more air strikes per day than Ukraine. Typically, Russia flies over 40 airstrikes per day, whereas Ukraine has most recently been flying less than 10 and, some days, as few as 5.

Analysts have noted that Russia has allocated some 500 fixed-wing aircraft and 100 Ka-52 helicopters to the war on Ukraine.

Of the 100 overall Russian helicopter losses, the breakdown by type, according to Oryx, is as follows:

·      20 Mi-8 transport helicopters;

·      5 Mi-8 electronic warfare helicopters;

·      4 Mi-24P attack helicopters;

·      3 Mi-24V attack helicopters;

·      10 Mi-35M attack helicopters;

Advertisement

·      13 Mi-28 attack helicopters;

·      38 Ka-52 “Alligator” attack helicopters;

·      7 of unknown type.

Oryx, a Dutch open-source monitor, only records a piece of military equipment as a loss if there is video or photo evidence and a geolocation of the loss.

Russia’s true losses are likely to be higher.

Ukraine claims that Russia’s helicopter losses are currently 310. It says that Russian forces in Ukraine have lost “five times more helicopters” than during Moscow’s operations in Chechnya throughout the 1990s and early 2000s following the collapse of the Soviet Union. (According to Oryx, Russia lost 24 helicopters in the First Chechen War, and 51 in the second phase of the conflict.)

The Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) in London, a military think tank, has said that “the best Ka-52 crews got shot down early in the war while trying to penetrate deep behind Ukrainian lines.”

A Ka-52 Kamaz “Alligator” typically has a crew of two. One unit is priced at around $10 million.

“Now less-skilled crews are easy targets for ever bolder Ukrainian air defenders… The loss of experienced crews might sting more than the airframe write-offs do. It could take years for the air force to train good replacements for all the Ka-52 fliers who’ve died in Ukraine,” Forbes noted, citing RUSI.

Advertisement
To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here
You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Comments (4)

https://www.kyivpost.com/assets/images/author.png
Freddie
This comment contains spoilers. Click here if you want to read.

Sigh I don't see the 82nd airborne or the royal marines or polish troops on the ground so no they are not holding back Nato . As to child killers no respect to Russia. I hope the Ukraine blows up more stuff god job !

https://www.kyivpost.com/assets/images/author.png
Deesnuts
This comment contains spoilers. Click here if you want to read.

More líes about the wàr. So what else is new? Ukraíne already løst

https://www.kyivpost.com/assets/images/author.png
Morgan
This comment contains spoilers. Click here if you want to read.

Despite the losses of K-52 Helis, those nasty birds have stung the American priced Bradleys, German Leopard tanks and NATO vehicles. Give credit where it's due.

https://www.kyivpost.com/assets/images/author.png
Kevin
This comment contains spoilers. Click here if you want to read.

Amazing, if you ignore most of the propaganda, that Russia, has single handedly held of Nato...this bears some respect.

Bill
This comment contains spoilers. Click here if you want to read.

@Kevin, they are not holding NATO. they invaded the Ukraine. That is who they are fighting

Morgan
This comment contains spoilers. Click here if you want to read.

@Bill, Ukraine has been armed with NATO weaponry and intelligence. No country should invade another, but having NATO in Russia's backyard sparked this atrious war.

Tammy
This comment contains spoilers. Click here if you want to read.

@Morgan, Putin, and Putin alone sparked this war. He sees the US as no longer a threat (the division, the conspiracy nuts, etc) and wants to return Russia to glory. He wants all to fear him and Russia. Had Trump been elected round 2, Putin would already have Ukraine and it's President be dead or living in another country.

Jim Duncan
This comment contains spoilers. Click here if you want to read.

@Tammy,

https://www.kyivpost.com/assets/images/author.png
john Smith
This comment contains spoilers. Click here if you want to read.

@Morgan,

https://www.kyivpost.com/assets/images/author.png
john Smith
This comment contains spoilers. Click here if you want to read.

@Morgan, Garbage. Sovereign states have the right to join economic and military alliances, something which Russia itself has acknowledged in the past. The neighbours of Russia went west, it wasn't NATO going east. Ask yourself, why, given Russia's history of invasion and subjugation of it's neighbours, that they might want to do so, instead of spouting the BS narratives of Russia.

https://www.kyivpost.com/assets/images/author.png
Load More Replies
https://www.kyivpost.com/assets/images/author.png
https://www.kyivpost.com/assets/images/author.png
https://www.kyivpost.com/assets/images/author.png