Reports began surfacing in some media on Friday that the G7 is now considering exchanging frozen Russian assets for occupied Ukrainian territories, where Moscow can get their frozen assets back by giving up Ukrainian territories.

Among the channels that published the claim was “Ukraine 24/7 – news,” which did so on its Telegram channel and referenced an article by the Financial Times (FT) titled “The clash over whether to commandeer Russia’s frozen assets.”

Translated screenshot of the Telegram post. Photo: Telegram/ukraina_novosti


However, while the FT article does cite a German official posing the question as a future hypothetical, the official does not state that the G7 is actively pursuing the strategy.

Here’s the comment referenced in the FT article, which was the only reference to occupied Ukrainian territories throughout the article:

Screenshot of the German official’s comment featured in the FT article. Photo: FT

The comment was made in reference to one of Washington’s proposals on utilizing frozen Russian assets, where the West would release “about $50 billion of funding for Ukraine” by issuing a loan or bond secured against future profits.

Biden Officials Raise Concerns About Russian Momentum – NYT
Other Topics of Interest

Biden Officials Raise Concerns About Russian Momentum – NYT

From better electronic warfare to capitalizing on delays in US aid and Ukrainian mobilization, Moscow’s initial blunders have been reversed.

While Washington’s proposal would provide short-term relief to Kyiv, it cannot account for circumstances that would arise when the war ends in the near future, the unnamed German official says.

That said, the plan is just one of the many options the West is considering. While most Western countries have agreed to utilize frozen Russian assets to aid Ukraine, the challenges now lie in choosing the appropriate mechanism due to the legal complexities – outright confiscation is currently off the table for Europe but not the US, but the alternatives might also lead to dilemmas for the West.


Europe’s alternatives

At present, Europe is set to vote in the coming weeks on utilizing the €3 billion per year profit generated from frozen Russian assets – not the assets themselves – to collectively purchase weapons for Ukraine.

This would likely circumvent the legal complexity of confiscating foreign assets, of which many Western countries are reluctant since it would set a precedence for other countries to potentially follow suit, confiscating Western assets based on reparation claims from past conflicts.

However, the plan would likely require approval from all 27 member states, which can face opposition from states with a friendlier stance towards the Kremlin.

Washington’s stance

Washington took a more aggressive stance on frozen Russian assets and called for their outright confiscation, arguing previously that there is a legal basis for the move.

While it is not clear how Washington might proceed, the recent foreign aid bill signed by US President Joe Biden has granted Washington the right to confiscate Russian assets, which could happen in the coming months.


However, Washington currently possesses only $5 billion of frozen Russian state assets as opposed to more than €190 billion in Europe, which would likely lead to less severe ramifications.

“They have little skin in the game,” a European diplomat told FT.

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here
You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Comments (3)
Coach John
This comment contains spoilers. Click here if you want to read.

Man I would love to be a fly on the wall for that hypothetical conversation.
German diplomat: "Mr. President, we recommend you give up Crimea and Russian-occupied parts of Donbas in exchange for frozen Russian assets. The Americans will not object to that deal."
Zelenskyy to American diplomat: "Is that your position as well?"
American: "Yes, sir."
Zelenskyy: "Well, I tell you what gentlemen ... throw in Bavaria and Florida, and we have a deal."
This comment contains spoilers. Click here if you want to read.

What a farcical comment. Time for that German bureaucrat to be investigated for putin ties if they meant what was said.

There is nothing in Ukraine that is any ally's property to give away.

I would rather my nation us double, triple, quadruple..etc its allied military support to Ukraine to ensure its victory, then see Ukraine be forced to concede anything. I would hope for no less if the shoe was on the other foot.

We need to fully understand what has caused the lack luster allied response to putin's criminal genocide and attempt at nation theft. Certainly the money trail of those profiting from not immediately sending Ukraine all frozen russian assets needs to be fully investigated. Those nations and bureaucrats gaining from stalling Ukraine's full victory, should either spend their remaining days in jail and / or as penance have their own personal assets be diverted to support Ukraine's rebuild.

Absolutely no immunity should be granted for any crime that that if committed by the rest of us would pit the laws fully against us.
This comment contains spoilers. Click here if you want to read.

That exchange sounds like a very fair suggestion. But I am afraid Russia is putting excess value on relinquishing occupied territory. The west should stress the losses in lives, resources and sanctions that could be restored to some degree with the exchange that would appeal to civilian society.