US President Joe Biden on Saturday (March 23) signed into law a $1.2 trillion spending package, keeping the US government funded through a fiscal year that began six months ago.

Biden described the package, which Congress overwhelmingly passed in the early hours of Saturday, as investing in Americans as well as strengthening the economy and national security. The Democratic president urged Congress to pass other bills stuck in the legislative chambers.

“The House must pass the bipartisan national security supplemental to advance our national security interests,” Biden said in a statement. “And Congress must pass the bipartisan border security agreement, the toughest and fairest reforms in decades, to ensure we have the policies and funding needed to secure the border. It’s time to get this done.”


The Democratic-majority Senate passed the spending bill with a 74-24 vote. Key federal agencies including the departments of Homeland Security, Justice, State and Treasury, which houses the Internal Revenue Service, will remain funded through 30 September.

But the measure did not include funding for mostly military aid to Ukraine, Taiwan or Israel, which are included in a different Senate-passed bill that the Republican-led House of Representatives has ignored.

The business community welcomed the passage of the spending bill and committed to continue working with policymakers to advance legislation that would enhance tax breaks for businesses and low-income families.

‘We Will Increase Intensity of Attacks on Storage Bases’ – Russia to Step Up Strikes on Western Weapons in Ukraine
Other Topics of Interest

‘We Will Increase Intensity of Attacks on Storage Bases’ – Russia to Step Up Strikes on Western Weapons in Ukraine

Shoigu claimed that Russian forces had gained the upper hand along the 1,000 km battlefront, disproving the notion of the superiority of Western weapons.

“A fully operational US government provides important stability for American businesses, workers and families,” Business Roundtable CEO Joshua Bolten said in a statement. “We look forward to continuing to work with Members of Congress to advance sound policies, including the Tax Relief for American Families and Workers Act.”

Senate leaders spent hours on Friday negotiating a number of amendments to the budget bill that ultimately were defeated. The delay pushed passage beyond a Friday midnight deadline.


But the White House Office of Management and Budget issued a statement saying agencies would not be ordered to shut, expressing confidence the Senate would promptly pass the bill, which it did.

While Congress got the job done, deep partisan divides were on display again, as well as bitter disagreement within the House’s narrow and fractious Republican majority. Conservative firebrand Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene threatened to force a vote to remove Speaker Mike Johnson, a fellow Republican, for allowing the measure to pass.

The 1,012-page bill provides $886 billion in funding for the Defense Department, including a raise for US troops.

Johnson, as he has done more than 60 times since succeeding his ousted predecessor Kevin McCarthy in October, relied on a parliamentary maneuver on Friday to bypass hardliners within his own party, allowing the measure to pass by a 286-134 vote that had substantially more Democratic support than Republican.

For most of the past six months, the government was funded with four short-term stopgap measures, a sign of the repeated brinkmanship that ratings agencies have warned could hurt the creditworthiness of a federal government that has nearly $34.6 trillion in debt.


“This legislation is truly a national security bill — 70% of the funding in this package is for our national defense, including investments that strengthen our military readiness and industrial base, provide pay and benefit increases for our brave servicemembers and support our closest allies,” said Republican Senator Susan Collins, one of the main negotiators.

Opponents cast the bill as too expensive.

“It’s reckless. It leads to inflation. It’s a direct vote to steal your paycheck,” said Senator Rand Paul, part of a band of Republicans who generally oppose most spending bills.

The last partial federal government shutdown occurred during Donald Trump’s presidency, from 22 December 2018, until 25 January 2019. The record-long interruption in government services came as the Republican insisted on money to build a wall along the US border with Mexico and was unable to broker a deal with Democrats.

Greene lashes out

The new budget bill passed the House with 185 Democratic and 101 Republican votes, which led Greene, a hardline conservative, to introduce her measure to oust Johnson.

That move had echoes of October, when a small band of hardliners engineered a vote that removed McCarthy for relying on Democrats to pass a stopgap measure to avert another partial government shutdown. They had been angry at McCarthy since June, when he agreed with Biden on the outlines of the fiscal 2024 spending that were passed on Friday.


McCarthy’s ouster brought the House to a halt for three weeks as Republicans struggled to agree on a new leader, an experience many in the party said they did not want to repeat as the November election draws nearer.

And Greene said she would not push for an immediate vote on her move to force Johnson out.

“I filed a motion to vacate today. But it’s more of a warning than a pink slip,” the Georgia Republican told reporters on Friday.

Indeed, some Democrats said on Friday that they would vote to keep Johnson, if he were to call a vote on a $95 billion security assistance package already approved by the Senate for Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan.

That measure is unlikely to come up anytime soon, as lawmakers will now leave Washington for a two-week break.

Pockets of Republican opposition to more funding for Ukraine have led to fears that Russia could seriously erode Kyiv’s ability to continue defending itself.

Life is unlikely to become easier for Johnson anytime soon, with the looming departure of two members of his caucus – Ken Buck and Mike Gallagher – set to whittle his majority to a mere 217-213 in a month’s time. At that point, Johnson could afford to lose only one vote from his party on any measure that Democrats unite to oppose.


See the original here.

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here
You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Comments (2)
This comment contains spoilers. Click here if you want to read.

I wonder when the American voters will actually tire of the state of 'brinksmanship' and ineffectiveness in their MRGA manipulated congress?

I wonder if it's in the realm of US government possibilities to act similarly to the EU with regards to their problem children (Orban, Fico) and drop certain Federal benefits to the US States specifically represented by putinrumps MRGA aligned problem children. For that matter they should ensure that these putin plants have no access to anything sensitive details related to national security.

The 118th Congress to be the most unproductive US history. While they have voted 749 times, only a paltry 27 bills have passed the republican majority led US House. Even with a republican majority in the US House, it can't pass much without getting minority democrat party buy-in. Now the Republican National Committee (RNC) which controls election funding to its candidates has just given putinrump's daughter in law the keys to their safe and permission to let his PAC pay for his legal bills. So thats where donations to the RNC are going. Is that what Americans want?

When Canada's PC party started to tick off its conservative Canadian electorate, in the 1993 election while they entered 295 candidates, they dropped FROM HOLDING 156 SEATS TO ONLY 2! AND they were not even knowingly infested with MRGA plants.

I suspect the stalling putintrump party is in for a similar gutting by their fed up taxpayers.

Coach John
This comment contains spoilers. Click here if you want to read.

@John, "I wonder if it's in the realm of US government possibilities to act similarly to the EU with regards to their problem children (Orban, Fico) and drop certain Federal benefits to the US States specifically represented by putinrumps MRGA aligned problem children."
While it is certainly tempting to have the Biden Administration cut off funding for problematic 'MRGA' legislators, it is not politically possible for two reasons. First, imagine Biden vetoed a law that included funding for a federal development project that was in Rep. Marjorie Taylor Green's district. While her district's voters would feel the loss of federal money, so would Georgia's two Democratic senators who are on record supporting Ukraine, and who both won their seats by razor thin margins. Losing two powerful senators to hurt one back-bench Congresswoman would not be helpful. Second, these types of actions could only happen if Biden had 'line-item' veto power (the ability to cut out a part of a spending bill without scrapping the whole thing) practiced in the past by presidents like Reagan. Unfortunately for John's argument, that type of veto power was found to be unconstitutional in the Supreme Court case 'Clinton v. City of New York' in 1998.
Ukraine Will Win
This comment contains spoilers. Click here if you want to read.

Anyone who knows nothing about American politics, such as myself, could be forgiven for believing that the government of USA is dysfunctional.