The United States had initiated the delivery of weapons and ammunition to Ukraine as part of a new aid package, Pentagon spokesman Brigadier General Patrick Ryder announced, speaking during a briefing.

Ryder informed journalists that he could not disclose specific details regarding the terms of the military aid delivery to Ukraine.

“We've already started the process to move some of the weapons, ammunition, and equipment which will be, as I mentioned earlier there within days, if not sooner,” he said.

Additionally, Ryder mentioned that while some equipment may take longer to arrive, efforts are underway to deliver artillery ammunition promptly.

“Recognizing there's a variety of equipment and capabilities on the list that we put out. Some of those things will obviously take longer than others,” he said. “But when it comes to essential capabilities like ammunition, we're already moving out to make those deliveries.”

Advertisement

US plans to deploy additional military advisors to Ukraine sparks concerns

Another report published Saturday by Politico said: “The US is considering sending as many as 60 military advisers to Kyiv to facilitate the incoming weapons transfers while supporting the Ukrainian government. The advisers would be in a non-combat role.”

In response to the Pentagon's announcement of plans to deploy additional military advisors to Ukraine, concerns have been raised regarding potential escalation risks reminiscent of the Vietnam War.

It's a Churchill or Chamberlain Moment – House Democratic Leader
Other Topics of Interest

It's a Churchill or Chamberlain Moment – House Democratic Leader

Hakeem Jeffries told the CBS 60 Minute program that funding delays for Ukraine caused by a Republican Party “pro-Putin faction” have made it more likely that US troops may one day have to fight.

During a press briefing, Ryder addressed these concerns, stressing the differences between the situations in Vietnam and Ukraine. He stated that the advisors in Ukraine are not conducting training of indigenous forces, unlike the U.S. military's role in Vietnam.

Currently, a few advisors are operating out of the embassy in Ukraine, assisting in logistics support, weapon oversight programs, and end-use monitoring, he clarified.

While the decision to deploy additional advisors has not been finalized, General Ryder said that if approved, it would involve a small number of personnel operating under the embassy's Chief of Mission Authority.

Advertisement

“These forces are not in a combat role. They're in a non-combat role. They're an advisory role,” Ryder said.

“The United States has no intention of conducting combat operations inside Ukraine, nor are these forces going to be anywhere near the frontlines,” he added.

Despite concerns about potential danger, the General disclosed that all necessary precautions would be taken to ensure the safety of U.S. forces operating in Ukraine, as is done in other hotspot regions worldwide.

US President Joe Biden signed a bill to send a long-awaited $61 billion aid package for Ukraine on Wednesday, April 24. It was approved by the House of Representatives on Saturday, April 20, in a rare bipartisan coalition, 311-112, after months of impasse, and then approved by the Senate in a combined bill in a 79-18 vote on Tuesday before being signed by the US president on Wednesday.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky had even gone so far as to say that, without US support, “Ukraine will lose the war.”

To suggest a correction or clarification, write to us here
You can also highlight the text and press Ctrl + Enter

Comments (2)

https://www.kyivpost.com/assets/images/author.png
Ivanhoe
This comment contains spoilers. Click here if you want to read.

Good geopolitic thinking. Adding a little to this; isn’t it Russian army strategy to fight in the satellite countries, thus Ukraine and perhaps Belarus next. This also protects the steps of the Euro-asian flat lands? Ukraine would open the door to this geopgraphy if it entered NATO. Same with Georgia?

https://www.kyivpost.com/assets/images/author.png
John
This comment contains spoilers. Click here if you want to read.

I wonder how big of an exclusion zone would need to be carved out of russian territory, to ensure its future acts of aggression against its neighbours are gimped? It would at least need to have sufficient depth to prevent its cheaply produced artillery from wreaking havoc with its neighbours. I suppose the size would also need to be sufficient to deprive it of using any of its more cost effective weapons on its neighbours.

But then there is is the question of the extended range of modern cheap weaponized drones.

Maybe its best that post its upcoming collapse, russia's current territories are just ceded back to its original more peaceful inhabitants (pre-russian colonization).

https://www.kyivpost.com/assets/images/author.png